THE Bible shows that Jesus was 33 1/2 years old when he was impaled in the early spring of the year 33 C.E., at the time of the Jewish Passover. This means, counting backward, that he was born in the early fall of the year.
Pagan Rome’s celebration of Saturnalia, the birthday of the invincible sun, was some three months later.
How did the celebration of Jesus’ birth get pushed forward to December 25, to make it coincide blasphemously with the pagan celebration of the birthday of the sun?
The ever-shorter days of December stirred up superstitious panic among the sun worshipers, who feared that their god was dying. They burned candles and lit bonfires to help revive the ailing deity. It seemed to work. Following the winter solstice of December 21, the sun-god appeared to regain his strength as the days grew longer.
“December was the major month of pagan celebration, and Dec. 25 was the high point of the winter revelries,” explains Church Christmas Tab. “Some believe the bishop of Rome chose Dec. 25 as the birth date of Christ in order to ‘sanctify’ the pagan celebrations. What resulted was a strange mixture of the pagan and the Christian festivals that the world now calls Christmas.” The article admits: “The word ‘Christmas’ does not appear in the Bible. And Scripture gives no mandate for celebrating Jesus’ birth.”
No wonder theologian Tertullian complained: “By us, who are strangers to Sabbaths, and new moons and festivals, once acceptable to God, the Saturnalia [and other pagan feasts] are now frequented, gifts are carried to and fro, . . . and sports and banquets are celebrated with uproar.”
Pope Gregory I continued this defiling trend. According to Natural History magazine, “instead of trying to obliterate peoples’ customs and beliefs, the pope’s instructions were, use them. If a group of people worship a tree, rather than cut it down, consecrate it to Christ and allow them to continue their worship.”
No Mixing of Truth With Falsehood
Did this policy of compromise have divine approval? Note God’s warning to his people poised to enter pagan Canaan: “Watch out for yourself . . . for fear you may inquire respecting their gods, saying, ‘How was it these nations used to serve their gods? And I, yes, I, will do the same way.’ You must not do that way to Jehovah your God, for everything detestable to Jehovah that he does hate they have done to their gods.” (Deuteronomy 12:30, 31) The same warning is repeated in the Christian Greek Scriptures: “Do not become unevenly yoked with unbelievers. For what fellowship do righteousness and lawlessness have? Or what sharing does light have with darkness? Further, what harmony is there between Christ and Belial [footnote, Satan]? Or what portion does a faithful person have with an unbeliever?”—2 Corinthians 6:14, 15.
What does God find so offensive about these false gods and the worship of them?
Saturn was the Roman sun-god honored by the Saturnalia. Was he worthy? Simon Schama, professor of history at Harvard University, calls him “the orgiast of eating, drinking and other kinds of naughtiness.” Lear’s magazine calls the holiday “the most famous wine orgy in the ancient world.”
Cult worship of the sun-god Mithra spanned Asia. According to anthropologist Gabriel Seabrook, he was “a warrior god, who hurled life-destroying arrows and incurable diseases at his enemies on the battlefield.”
Sun worship among the Aztecs was particularly bloody. Natural History magazine explains that “unless victims were sacrificed to the sun gods, all life—including that of the gods—would die.”
Upon reviewing the origins of this celebration (see box below), it may perhaps come as no surprise to you that witches and Satan worshipers still revere December 25. The San Francisco Chronicle of December 21, 1991, quotes a witch and popular pagan writer as saying: “It is one of our more strenuous holidays. We stay up all night.” A member of the group Covenant of the Goddess stated: “We do a ritual enactment. . . . Members of our clergy perform a mystery play about the birth of the solar child.”
Will God or his Son accept such honor, which mirrors the worship of false gods?
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/12/15/article_01.htm
(Yes i am, please email me:) )
2006-11-29 05:50:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by New ♥ System ♥ Lady 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some say it was in September.
We can pinpoint the time of the Messiah's birth. Revelation 12 tells of the birth of the Messiah when the constellation Virgo (the woman in the heavens) was clothed with the sun and had the moon at her feet. This tells us that Jesus was born when the sun and moon were in Virgo. In other words, at the time of the September New Moon, or shortly thereafter. This fits the autumn lambing season. Furthermore, it coincides with the season of the three Jewish feasts, Trumpets, Atonement and Tabernacles. Interestingly, the apostle John records in John 1:14 that the "Word became flesh and tabernacled amongst us." As the New Moon was on the 10th and Tabernacles on the 25th September in 3 BC, the birth of Christ would be somewhere between those dates.
http://www.ldolphin.org/birth.html...
2006-11-28 12:50:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
From the reasearch I have done and a special that I think was done on either the History Channel or PBS, it would have had to of happened in the spring. Israel is not that warm in the winter.
Luke 2: 8: "And there were shepherds living out in the fields near by, keeping watch over their flocks at night."
In Palestine - as in the rest of the Middle East at the time - shepherds stayed with their flocks in the fields only from Spring to Autumn. They brought their sheep in during the winter to protect them from the cold and rain. It is thus unlikely that the shepherds went to Bethlehem in December.
2006-11-28 12:54:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dublin Ducky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now it doesn't find that Christmas should be in June, It finds maybe that Jesus was born in June. We are certain that many Christians don't celebrate Easter on the 'correct' day. But the celebration is of the Resurrection. Even in the OT there were two days -- separated by a month -- on which you could celebrate Passover. The important part was not the actual date. Don't go fundamentalist on me.
2016-03-29 14:54:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Based on the scriptural evidence, a case can apparently be made that Jesus Christ was born on the 15th day of the month of Tishri, on the first day of the Feast of Tabernacles, which corresponds to the September - October timeframe of our present calendar....
Makes sense to me....but I don't really care much. The truth is that He came, died, and Resurrected on the third day. Amen. Alleluia.
2006-11-28 12:51:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was born in August but the Church was assimilating pagan holidays & had to come with a big one to coincide with the winter-solstice, that's why December!
2006-11-28 13:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Julia B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think most will acknowledge that it wasn't December, but there are many accounts and speculations ranging from April to June to September. Who knows which is correct, and does it really matter?
2006-11-28 12:52:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by MyPreshus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not a chance
the celebrations in December are of pagan origin
2006-11-28 12:42:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Noble Angel 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Like all other christians holidays, christmas was a pagan holiday (yule) that was changed to make converting the pagans easier (I guess it was less messy than beheading them all).
2006-11-28 12:52:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but that's when the Romans celebrated Saturnalia, which by the sound of it, was a hell of a lot more fun that Christmas.
2006-11-28 12:43:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋