should us send more troops to iraq?

Answer 1

If there is an iron clad agenda to kill our enemy, and to discourage, forever more, the insurgents from entering Iraq, then I say yes. This would require a serious ratcheting up of our activities, it would require the use of bigger and meaner weapons and ordinance, it would require border crossings to get to the real bad guys. If this is our game plan, then I say yes.

If the purpose of sending more troops is to expand patrols and police action, then I say NOT. We don't need more of the same bull sh it, we need a policy that will destroy the enemy, and let them know, we finally mean business.

Sorry, libs, your pacification program has been put back on the shelf!

Answer 2

Absolutely not! Few troops in Afghanistan-remember that's why we went to war? Those US troops in Afghanistan are not under US command. The troops that were pulled out are in Iraq. It's such a mess there and I see no answers-certainly not from the Administration. Biden has some good ideas...

Answer 3

I wish we didn't have to, but as a mother of a soldier in Iraq, I would feel better for his safety if more troops were sent rather than more being brought home. After all, there is strength in numbers. My son is only 19 and is on his first tour.

Answer 4

Yes, a heavy border security force on the Iraq/Iran and Iraq/Syria border would help stop the flow of weapons to the enemy. There for dramatically reducing the number of attacks over a period of time in which the Iraq Government can unite and rebuild with relative peace and stability. That's the ultimate goal right, for stability in Iraq, so to create stability in the region. If I am wrong on the intent then the U.S. should say so.

Answer 5

each and every thing that occurs, no matter if to human beings, to international places, or inspite of the actuality that, is in God's plans. there's a clarification for each little thing, we do purely not continually comprehend it on the time. there are such fairly some lies going round about the conflict...and the most important culprits are the media. They tell the liberals what they pick to take heed to...by no ability ideas the actuality. and also you suck all of it in! The Bible even tells us about this time, even as there'll be wars and rumors of wars, and so a lot extra it truly is surely happening now! And it isn't "selfish" to have a toddler with downs! It got here about, and she or he knew that for some reason God needed this to take position. Many different women would have finished a similar element (except the liberals...they'd homicide it with out a idea!). you're the selfish ones! God knows who's mendacity and who's truthful. it really is all that concerns...he's the single we are going to might want to respond to to .

Answer 6

Theyre there; whether you support the war or not. America is there, we cant pull out now; even the Democrats in Congress know it. According to Generals in the Army, it would be beneficial to put more troops in Iraq. Now if one of the highest ranked, experienced people in the best military in the world says you need more troops, why wouldnt you listen to him?

Answer 7

Well that is a real touchy question for me, but I wanted to respond anyway. I have 2 son's 23 and 18 who are in the military. The oldest is in the airforce and the youngest just left for infantry training to become a ranger. I hate the fact that there are wars, but it is undoubtly going to always be some type of war anyway you look at it. It is though Americans and abroad will be putting stakes on certain beliefs and wanting to take action one way or the other, even if it means ones' life. There seems to be so much more hatered than ever in this world at this time. I wish the american gov. would use the christian values that our constitution stands for in order for a more perfect union.

Answer 8

Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blamed the United States for the chaos in Iraq, saying the answer to the violence is the withdrawal of foreign forces.

But following Khamenei's comments, the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend for one year the mandate of the 160,000-strong multinational force in Iraq.

Seems the UN thinks soldiers need to be there!

Answer 9

We should make major changes in our government before we risk any more American lives. President Bush and Cheney should resign first, then we can start over again with some competent leaders. Iraq can be won if we have the right leaders.

Answer 10

Nope = those troops should be on our own borders first - securing this country here....from the threat which is going to happen sooner than later....with the open boders being so porous....and uncontrolled....