You now how people say they are so rich
Then there are people who love to help people who need the help. They don't care how rich they are. What would you rather be...rich in LOVE or MONEY? Maybe even both, I don't care.
2006-11-28 08:45:22 · 16 answers · asked by adrienne n 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Community Service
Money has a way of separating us from even what we love...so I would MUCH rather be rich in love.
Money is here today, gone tomorrow; whereas love...it is for all eternity...
2006-11-28 10:21:15 · answer #1 · answered by terryoulboub 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never knew that my father who is 75 years old this year had any money until he became ill. But I have found through the time that I have been here that he is extremely generous. He buys homeless peoples meals, he carrys coats in his car to give to the homeless, he has sponsored halfway houses, veterans causes and police Big Brother/Sister programs. Since then we started collecting crutches and walkers to take up to the local hospital so that those who cannot afford them will have them. He is known as the candy man in hospital emergency rooms.
I was goiong out with someone very special in September and the he needed to have back surgery. My father said he would pay to get him a second opinion.
His genuine concern and love for people comes first. His money is what helps him to contribute.
2006-11-28 09:22:56 · answer #2 · answered by e_piphany214 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well "rich" is a funny thing. As is "love". I think (only my opinion) if you love someone they should be your equal in everything. Love makes money and money makes love. For instance you can have a rich husband who buys you everything but cheats on you and treats you bad. Or you can have a wonderful husband who loves you but you can't survive because he does't work and you have no money.
Couples have to come to an agreement and every situation is different.
I would like to be "comfortable" financially and in love. If I were rich I would do my best to provide for the homeless and try my best to build a better world for children in need.
2006-11-28 08:55:00 · answer #3 · answered by shellie t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I can have both I would take it\
but I guess rich in love, if I really had to choice
2006-11-28 08:53:07 · answer #4 · answered by goldenbrowngod 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love....and maybe a little money just to get by.
But if i had to choose eternal love or be rich (in money) and alone i would choose love :) No amount of money can make you happy if you have no-one to share it with.
2006-11-28 23:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you asking us what we are? i'm prosperous in love. i might particularly choose to be prosperous in the two, yet once I had to compliment, it could be love. What solid might all the money be in case you haven't any longer have been given relatives to proportion it with or spend it on? actual, prosperous in Love is greater appropriate! :)
2016-12-13 16:10:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be rich in love. but money is a very, very close second.
2006-11-28 08:47:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would rather be loved and to love then to have money.
2006-11-28 09:47:00 · answer #8 · answered by The Animal Psychiatrist♬♪ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lov hands down
if the meanning of live is love
how would we eaver make it 2 the next step
the real prob. is finding your filling at least when ur a man
2006-11-28 10:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by rich e 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i choose rich in love..
rich in love and no money (least you have someone)
rich in money but have no one (you wouldn't have someone to love and to share the joys with)
2006-11-28 08:54:32 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ Lisa♥ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋