well can I prove God Exist?

Question

yes. it's simple

what atheist and nonbelievers want to see is a sign, something supernatural, something you can touch see and hear. right?? if something out of this world show up to prove there is a God? Would you believe it..

well JESUS is the sign.

now nobody is the whole world can deny that Jesus Existed. I'm sorry but the Historical Facts approved Jesus Existence. There are millions of proves that Jesus walked on the earth and performed many miracles..

Now whether you believe or not Jesus existed o.k nobody can prove me wrong..

Now we all know Jesus is the son of God, right!! HE came here to show us the way, the truth. and he said that no one can come to the Father (God) if is not thru his son Jesus.

now you can't prove me wrong.. the history Shows the existence of God through Jesus.

atheist = boring answers

Answer 1

Why would I believe in Jesus "the supernatural son of a god"? Perhaps a man named Jesus did exist and was executed, but that doesn't prove his divinity.

We "all" don't know Jesus is the son of God. That presupposes the existence of God and atheists are WITHOUT belief in deities. You can't "prove" something simply by saying "well of course you believe in this".

You didn't solve the problem, you just added another imaginary deity to it.

Answer 2

One obvious and absolute truth about God is that he or she can not be proved. There is no proof even if Jesus did exist, what about proof NOW? What is the Proof right at this moment?
One of the qualities of God is that the God can not be proved. Now, just for kicks, if you did not believe that God was here in the form of Jesus, how could you prove there is a God? Let me save all of us some time. You can't!
I suggest you open your mind, because proof of God is not the point of knowing God. Knowing does not require proof, because you already know that God exists if you know what I mean.
In fact, proof has to do with common sense or, and the scientific method of knowing.
Common sense also needs nothing more in the way of truth than being repeated often, that is why it is common.
But, the thing you are searching for is the difference between knowing and believing. One requires some form of proof and the other needs no proof.
Faith is a form of knowing like inference, almost. But, faith is not an act of will power.
Faith is a recognition of the power and goodness that life offers. You do not need to figure out faith because you do not need to have proof. Faith is the existential leap that is rewarded. Rewarded by having faith.

Answer 3

This doesn't seem to be a question, but I will address it anyway.

Jesus's existence being a "proven fact", is just plain wrong. There is little evidence for him existing, other than the bible. Not in Jewish history, nor in Roman history - btw, the Romans were meticulous record keepers.

That said, it doesn't mean he didn't exist.

However, existing doesn't mean he wasn't simply a very enlightened person with an important message, who people confused for his message. The statement, "Value the water more, and the pitcher less" exemplifies the meaning of this.

In other words, there is no compelling evidence, other than 2000 year old hearsay, that Jesus was supernatural, the son of god, etc.

If there was, then there would be no need of faith. Faith is acceptance without evidence. If there was strong evidence, then faith is not only unnecessary, but not really faith.

My problem is with the concept of faith. The whole idea of accepting something with no compelling evidence.

I have no problem with you believing what you wish, but I do have problems when you insult, belittle, or harass me for not holding your beliefs. I don't insult, belittle, or harass you for your beliefs - Funny, but isn't that the "Christian" thing to do?

Answer 4

You are right about MAYBE one thing. Jesus MIGHT have walked the earth, dispite your insistance there is little hard evidence to support that claim 100%. Past that one possibility your assumption fall flat. There is 1 shaky source that claims he performed miracles, there is 1 shaky source that claims he was the son of god. Your basis for all of that is that the bible is a history book, it is not. At best the bible is a collection of stories or parables. It has to be viewed much the same as we view ancient Greek and Roman mythology tales. So overall I'd say you proved yourself wrong with your poor logic and assumptions.

Answer 5

i'm in basic terms a man or woman with limited perceptions, only like quite everyone else. I have confidence God does exist, yet no longer in any anthropomorphic experience that is waiting to be shown or measured scientifically. This being the main in all probability rationalization for the a while previous debate, I end that i'm no longer able to provide any friendly answer that could persuade you the two way.

Answer 6

Actually you can't prove it because that was nearly 3,000 years ago. And there is no factual evidence about any of it...think about it no evidence what so ever. And more than half the entire worlds population disagrees that Jesus or God are the Almighty - they may not all agree but more than half the population believes in something else such as Buddha, Allah, nothing, etc.

So really yours is not a valid point.


BUT you do have great hair!

Answer 7

rofl.

Jesus has been dead for 2000 years. There's no proof Jesus even existed and some 2000 year old book isn't enough to turn his existance into truth.

Now, lets dismiss that fact and go with the things the bible says.

Jesus was born of an immaculate conception. And you actually believe that load of garbage? Mary got pregnant while sleeping around and then lied about it to cover it up because she'd probably have been stoned to death.

Jesus isn't the son of god, he's probably the son of Joseph.

Thats IF he existed at all.

What you just posted ISN'T proof. Its what YOU WANT to be proof. Those aren't the same thing.

Try again.

Answer 8

Better work on proving Jesus existed now.

There is this guy doing miracles, feeding thousands at a time, raising the dead and all that is written about him is a crappy little piece of work called the bible? The Jews don't write about him, the Egyptians don't and even the Romans that supposedly kill him do not write down anything about this "trouble maker"

Sounds like quite a fish story to me.

Answer 9

Um, I'm christian, but using Jesus as proof of God isn't exactly smart, and using the Bible is like saying, "I said so."

But then again, atheists can't prove God is fake, either, so its a rat race. But come up with better evidence next time, I know of some.

Answer 10

IF JESUS WAS REAL, WERE THE HELL ARE HIS BONES. WHERE IS THE CROSS HE WAS HOOKED ON????



God is fake. in the bible it says that it is a sin to have kids with you're brother n sister and all that bogus... BUT WEREN'T WE ALL CREATED BY ADAM AND EVE, DOESN'T THAT MAKE US ALL RELATED, GOD DUFFIE'S HIS OWN COMMANDMENT. another commandment he breaks is THY SHALL NOT KILL. How the hell do we survive without killing, we kill animals to survive and alot of other things too. AND WHAT HAPPENDS TO THE ANIMALS WHEN THEY DIE, THEY CANT PRAY OR ANYTHING so they have no choice but to go to hell.
God is fake because there have never been any signs of god EVER but inside the bible. And another thing, the bible was only created to scare people, that if they did something really bad they go to hell. It was created to keep order in the world.

YOU JUST GOT PROVEN *****