English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Neither. DNA doesn't change. And the heart only pumps the blood, it doesn't make or act on it.

2006-11-28 04:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by LoneStar 6 · 0 0

It would change neither, since the DNA is being stored inside the nucleus of each and every cell that constitute your body. Even if someone else's heart is being transplanted in another man's body, the DNA is not an issue as far as the "risk" of DNA changing. The risk that does come out of the transplant is the accepting body's immune system, and how well it receives the newly transplanted organ; there is a risk that the immune system would recognize the heart as a "foreign invader" and begin to attack it by producing cells that would destroy the heart and surrounding areas, that is why people with transplants must take immuno-suppressive drugs, in addition to a good matching donor. However, DNA does not even go into the list of risk factors in heart transplants, since DNA is like a neat package that no other factor can intervene or change, not at least with transplants. I hope this helped, Good Luck.

2006-11-28 05:11:04 · answer #2 · answered by LaLaLand 2 · 1 0

Neither one. Your blood cells are for the most part produced in your bone marrow. So, your blood cells' DNA is what is found in your bone marrow. Your transplanted heart will always have the DNA of the donor from whom the heart was taken. So, either one will change its DNA to the other.

2006-11-28 04:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by hcbiochem 7 · 0 0

All DNA would remain the same.

The transplanted heart would be detected as a foreign protein by the immune system which would require some level of supression to prevent rejection.

2006-11-28 04:59:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it would replace neither, by ability of actuality the DNA is being saved interior the nucleus of each and every and each and every cellular that signify your body. in spite of if somebody else's heart is being transplanted in yet another guy's body, the DNA isn't a controversy as far by ability of actuality the "danger" of DNA replacing. the danger that does come out of the transplant is the accepting body's immune gadget, and how properly it receives the newly transplanted organ; there is available that the immune gadget would understand the midsection as a "foreign places invader" and initiate to attack it by creating use of generating cells that would want to ruin the midsection and surrounding factors, for this reason those with transplants might want to take immuno-suppressive drugs, besides to a reliable matching donor. regardless of the glaring incontrovertible actuality that, DNA does no longer even bypass into the record of danger factors in heart transplants, when you think about that DNA is form of a neat kit that no distinct component can intervene or replace, no longer a minimum of with transplants. i'm hoping this helped, reliable fulfillment.

2016-11-29 21:32:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers