it is more time efficient to have a simulated convoy that you shoot out of or a computer screen for practice that you can reset.
think of it this way the mission is to drive through a city when you get attacked. you fight your way through the city and now you drive 2 miles or more back to the start it again and retry. or, click the reset button and do it again.
2006-11-28 06:19:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by sand runner 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the army makes use of video games to help heighten their reflexes and it statistically works. And it rather is one rationalization why the army made a public interest - that's the main lifelike FPS interest ever made and between the main nicely-known. It additionally serves as a recruiting gadget. yet in all seriousness, there is not something cowardly approximately saving lives. If we are in a place to combat a struggle with pcs and drones we would desire to a minimum of no person dies you buffoon.
2016-12-17 17:42:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by chappie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whatever works.
Teaches great hand-eye coordination and if it is monitored by a computer more ability to catch and correct errors than relying on just human instructors that are covering a number of soldiers
2006-11-28 03:20:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Akkita 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The military has been doing this for decades. In the past the simulators cost millions of dollars - now they are inexpensive enough for widespread use.
2006-11-28 03:23:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, they use simulations with all kinds of training already - flight training, space flight, police decision-making, etc - why not?
What you can emulate is the clutter of battle and work on the decision-making, communications, and command skill-sets.
2006-11-28 03:38:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it works then it's fine with me. Sounds like a great way to learn these techniques
2006-11-28 03:16:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by only p 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds like a great idea, though virtual reality or even paintballing or something like that would help.
2006-11-28 06:19:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It can teach them some crucial skills that don't need to be learned directly in the field.
2006-11-28 03:58:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's a hell of a lot cheaper than live fire exercises...
2006-11-28 03:20:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by mmd 5
·
1⤊
0⤋