Have a look at what the Louvre have to say about her.
Portrait of Lisa Gherardini, wife of Francesco del Giocondo
This portrait was doubtless painted in Florence between 1503 and 1506. It is thought to be of Lisa Gherardini, wife of a Florentine cloth merchant named Francesco del Giocondo - hence the alternative title, La Gioconda. However, Leonardo seems to have taken the completed portrait to France rather than giving it to the person who commissioned it. It was eventually returned to Italy by Leonardo's student and heir Salai. It is not known how the painting came to be in François I's collection.
Description
Lisa Gherardini, wife of Francesco Giocondo
The history of the Mona Lisa is shrouded in mystery. Among the aspects which remain unclear are the exact identity of the sitter, who commissioned the portrait, how long Leonardo worked on the painting, how long he kept it, and how it came to be in the French royal collection.
The portrait may have been painted to mark one of two events - either when Francesco del Giocondo and his wife bought their own house in 1503, or when their second son, Andrea, was born in December 1502 after the death of a daughter in 1499. The delicate dark veil that covers Mona Lisa's hair is sometimes considered a mourning veil. In fact, such veils were commonly worn as a mark of virtue. Her clothing is unremarkable. Neither the yellow sleeves of her gown, nor her pleated gown, nor the scarf delicately draped round her shoulders are signs of aristocratic status.
A new artistic formula
The Mona Lisa is the earliest Italian portrait to focus so closely on the sitter in a half-length portrait. The painting is generous enough in its dimensions to include the arms and hands without them touching the frame. The portrait is painted to a realistic scale in the highly structured space where it has the fullness of volume of a sculpture in the round. The figure is shown in half-length, from the head to the waist, sitting in a chair whose arm is resting on balusters. She is resting her left arm on the arm of the chair, which is placed in front of a loggia, suggested by the parapet behind her and the two fragmentary columns framing the figure and forming a "window" looking out over the landscape. The perfection of this new artistic formula explains its immediate influence on Florentine and Lombard art of the early 16th century. Such aspects of the work as the three-quarter view of a figure against a landscape, the architectural setting, and the hands joined in the foreground were already extant in Flemish portraiture of the second half of the 15th century, particularly in the works of Hans Memling. However, the spacial coherence, the atmospheric illusionism, the monumentality, and the sheer equilibrium of the work were all new. In fact, these aspects were also new to Leonardo's work, as none of his earlier portraits display such controlled majesty.
An emblematic smile
The Mona Lisa's famous smile represents the sitter in the same way that the juniper branches represent Ginevra Benci and the ermine represents Cecilia Gallerani in their portraits, in Washington and Krakow respectively. It is a visual representation of the idea of happiness suggested by the word "gioconda" in Italian. Leonardo made this notion of happiness the central motif of the portrait: it is this notion which makes the work such an ideal. The nature of the landscape also plays a role. The middle distance, on the same level as the sitter's chest, is in warm colors. Men live in this space: there is a winding road and a bridge. This space represents the transition between the space of the sitter and the far distance, where the landscape becomes a wild and uninhabited space of rocks and water which stretches to the horizon, which Leonardo has cleverly drawn at the level of the sitter's eyes.
2006-11-28 06:25:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by samanthajanecaroline 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
some people will say that this painting is a ctually a self portrait of Leonardo Di Vinci, as a woman, if you superimpose a picture of him with the Mona Lisa, the characteristics are remarkably similar
2006-11-28 14:42:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by dannydolphin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think there may be a little hype involved, built up gradually over the years. into what is now a big monster. and then we find ourselves trying to explain and overanalyze a simple (but extremely fine) portrait. its more about the creator of the portrait. the deepness and accomplishments of his life are forced into our readings of this portrait. men paint women for very simple reasons. we like them.
2006-11-28 08:51:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by edward x 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was like a crackerjack prize back then because it was about jesus because up till then all the art was about god so they made a painting of jesus without eyebrows
because people talked about god thinking about their beards in the morning,
and now no one thinks everyone thinks jesus beard is his defining point of intrest.
and since no one knows that everyones art is still about the bible because its not what they wanted it to look like or be about when they made it,
so there
2006-11-28 01:50:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
She was painted for her smile, but what they say is the mystery is actually her eyes....they say that no matter where you´re standing, they seem to follow you around the room......
2006-11-28 02:48:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lau 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go to ITSJUSTLIFE.COM and read this theory v interesting
2006-11-29 00:23:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by cheers 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer can be found on this website:
WWW.EncephalonEpitaph.com
2006-11-28 01:57:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Afreeloader 2
·
0⤊
2⤋