I wonder how many of you will consider this "religious dogma"?
http://www.worldviewweekend.com/secure/cwnetwork/article.php?ArticleID=1293
Might I add that this article has information a lot of people in the scientific community didn't even know.
What's your input?
No bashing or slamming please.Biased and non biased opinions,but no mean attacks on anyone please.
2006-11-28 00:10:41 · 6 answers · asked by Derek B 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nothing wrong with faith. It's the argument of who's got the bigger God that's the problem. Nice article but it is no different than an argument about the color of the sky. Everyone has an opinion, that's true, but no one can back down and just let them have it?
2006-11-28 00:16:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well first off the author of that article never sites anything...simply claiming that People who are religious are healthier...which is utterly a lie. In Dawkins books and Dennet's the say the opposite..and trust me I work at a hospital and that's simply not true. Secondly....He sites of all people Ann Coulter!!!! HAHAHAHAHA that's laughable. Dennett and Dawkins are Genius's and maybe reading their books would do you some good instead of listening to someone pretend to know what they are talking about. if he had actual quotes from their books. And just because the kids who shot up their class mentioned Natural selection it doesn't make up for the billions of people that religious people have killed. I think you really need to stop reading that crap because all it does is prove Dawkins,Darwin and Dennett right.
2006-11-28 00:19:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
This article is as evangelical as the Christians and Muslims are. It is religious dogma. Dawkins is an angry miserable human being.
2006-11-28 01:10:45 · answer #3 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Standard conservative Christian fare-ad hominem, misrepresentation of facts, the usual attempts to villify atheism through misinformation. It's pretty weak if its supposed be discrediting atheism, or Dawkins. The author should challenge Dawkins to an open debate-he'd last about two minutes.
2006-11-28 00:16:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A flawed article from a religious group.
2006-11-28 00:19:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I do not go to trashy links. I thought you wanted reply from someone with a thinking mind.I study the Holy Bible and I
think.
2006-11-28 00:31:12 · answer #6 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋