2006-11-27 22:20:18 · 15 answers · asked by 悟行者 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
NO
Next question!
2006-11-27 22:21:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, the Dem's (here), wouldn't have a lot to say about it if Israel did what it did to the hezzbollahs to Iran. And damn them if they did, hell, it was them who very well may have gotten this mess going in the first place long ago...making deals with potential terrorists, and bad guys...the Dem's are crafty. Its all there, the proofs in the pudding.
Later, it won't matter. Cause things are going for a spin on high and not gonna stop...a war of a new age is upon us.
As for 2007 prediction of a ww3, I say no...not a ww3 in a total destruction ww3- more like a series of smaller, bloody wars fought in various regions.
The problem is: not everyone is on-board and supporting the idea of a world free from terror and religion based conflicts, this enhances the danger because some of the countries like Russia, China...etc, dont care.
Religion started all this no matter how you flip it....religion will lead us to the end. Where is god now...on a permanent vacation?
For today, we sit and wait...not knowing how things will REALLY turn out-and we care. But tomorro, it may be that we find this problem is too much...
2006-11-28 06:49:00 · answer #2 · answered by Diadem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can't happen ON 2007.It may happen In 2007.
Btw with all the support for those dems we'll prolly never see another world war anytime soon.Damn!
2006-11-28 06:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by blah,blah,blah 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In order for a war of that magnitude to occur, we would need a clear superpower to deviate from international peace efforts.
Othwise all we have is a country or two trying to cause mischief.
Even if Iran Venuezuela could gather up countries for their cause, it would be incomparible to what u.s and its allies could muster up with or without the U.N.s support
so the answer is NO war
probably another conflict to out stretch the already overextended u.s military forces though
2006-11-28 06:47:37 · answer #4 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We are already at WW3. World Wide War on terrorism and that's not including the war in Iraq. NATO troops are deployed everywhere, Seas of West and East Africa, Lebanon, Afghanistan and on our home soil.
2006-11-28 10:06:39 · answer #5 · answered by verduneuro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more "World Wars" as in 1914 and 1939, but new "worldwide wars" on some activities and ideas and behaviors.
2006-11-28 06:26:49 · answer #6 · answered by marechal_00 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Late 2008 or early 2009
2006-11-28 06:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Soon to be if korea don't stop producing nuclear war head nad bush kept on pushing the korean.
Well let watch and see.
2006-11-29 21:56:18 · answer #8 · answered by hafidz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another world war would be devastating. No doubt nuclear weapons would be used. When that happens its game over!
2006-11-28 06:46:46 · answer #9 · answered by Tom 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be nice, save me from buying replacement supplies for the stuff hitting the experation dates.
2006-11-28 08:16:52 · answer #10 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are already in war ... it is just that it is in a different .. more potent form ... it is called terrorism
2006-11-28 06:23:20 · answer #11 · answered by Rain 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋