Consider that Injeel that was available to Muhammed is still available today and are in agreement with the New Testament today. How is it that the Qur'an called these the holy words of God and Muslisms argue against their own scripture when the call it corrupt?
2006-11-27
20:41:01
·
9 answers
·
asked by
djmantx
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
It amazes me how little Muslims seem to know their own religion.
2006-11-27
21:02:12 ·
update #1
Acid if you believe in the New Testament you agree Jesus is the son ofgod and died to atone for sin.
2006-11-27
21:03:45 ·
update #2
Sher: you need to study and be a good Muslim injeel is the four Gospels
2006-11-27
21:09:49 ·
update #3
Poki if I show you the Gospel from before the birth of your false prophet and it is the same Gospel as today..Why would Muhammed call it the holy word of God? And then say that Jesus is not the son of God and he never died to atone for sin?
2006-11-27
21:12:41 ·
update #4
Poki Muslims continue to say the word of God is corrupt but can never pin point when it became corrupt must have been after Muhammed or he would have mentioned it rather than call the Gospels the holy word of God right? maybe they were corrupted after Muhammed? then why are they in agreement with the Gospel that predates Muhammed?
2006-11-27
21:16:23 ·
update #5
If I can show propehesy of Christ from the book of Moses and I mean my Christ not yours the Christ that atones for sin and they predate Christ by 1500 years...Then when did the scriptue become corrupt and why didn't Jesus or Muahmmed mention it?
2006-11-27
21:19:47 ·
update #6
Truth seeker Muhammed called them holy the same Gospels that tell of Christ being crucified which is different from the Qur'an that claims he wasn't. What gives? Show me the corruption that changed the crucifiction of Christ? They all agree that Christ was crucified therefore Muhammed would have to agree and yet he doesn't...So which scripture is corrupt? The one that calls itself corrupt the Qur'an.
2006-11-27
21:41:20 ·
update #7
The Christian Bible predates Muhammad and Islam by 500 years. The Jewish Torah predates Muhammad and Islam by 1,000 - 3,000 years. Muhammad said for Muslims to read the Bible for "Guidance and Light." For Islam to say they are corrupted, then is to call Muhammad a liar for recommending it.
The same Bible Muhammad would have seen (if he ever did) is in both (1) The Vatican (Codex Vaticanus) and (2) British Museum (Codex Sinaticus). It is all there, including Jesus dying on the cross as atonement for our sins. And, His resurrection, and ascension into heaven - in front of many witnesses. The New Testament is preserved in almost perfect condition in these two Greek texts which both predate Muhammad and Islam.
2006-11-27
21:42:14 ·
update #8
Freedom sorry i should have quoted that from the Qur'an he never called the Injeel or the Torah unholy only holy Muslims today call it corrupt because it doesn't agree wiht the Qur'an......Sura 5:68 - Say: "O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law (Torah), the Gospel (Injeel), and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord."
Sura 29:46 Muslims are told by Allah, not to question the authority of the scriptures of the Christians, saying, "And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, but say, "We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one;
2006-11-27
22:40:24 ·
update #9
Suras 6:34, 6:115, 10:64 and 50:28,29 clearly says to Muslims, "No change can there be in the words of Allah" and that Allah cannot alter (or abrogate) his words." So the Torah and Christian Gospels are correct, because Allah did verify this fact -- this clearly makes the Muslim Qur'an false; because it contradicts Allah.
2006-11-27
22:48:44 ·
update #10
Sura 3:48 - And He (Isa/Jesus) will teach him the Book and the wisdom and the Tavrat (Torah) and the Injeel (Christian Gospel).
2006-11-27
22:49:32 ·
update #11
Surely We revealed the Taurat (Torah/Bible Old Testament) in which was guidance and light", with it the prophets who submitted themselves....
2006-11-27
22:50:23 ·
update #12
Sura 5:46 - And We sent after them in their footsteps Isa, son of Marium, verifying what was before him of the Taurat (Jewish Torah) and We gave him the Injeel (Christian Gospels) in which was guidance and light, and verifying what was before it of Taurat and a guidance and an admonition for those who guard (against evil).
2006-11-27
22:51:16 ·
update #13
Sura 5.68 - Say: O followers of the Book! you follow no good till you keep up the Taurat and the Injeel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord;
2006-11-27
22:52:10 ·
update #14
Sura 46:12 we are told.... "And before it the Book of Musa (Moses) (Torah) was a guide and a mercy: and this is a Book verifying (it) in the Arabic language that it may warn those who are unjust and as good news for the doers of good......"
2006-11-27
22:54:04 ·
update #15
So when it speaks of Torah book of Moses and the Gospel together it is not speaking of scripture but ....inert gas? Could anything be more ridiculous?
2006-11-27
23:02:58 ·
update #16
I am not a Muslim so I cannot answer your question but I am very interested. Can you cite the verses of the Koran or the specific hadith that calls the Injeel "holy" and/or "corrupt"?
From what I have studied of the life of Muhammad, it appears to me that he started of with a beautiful message but once he became more powerful and after many many battles the tone of his messages changed drastically. In the early days, Jews and Christians were "people of the Book" -- later he called us "pigs and dogs."
My best guess would be that Muhammad called the Injeel "holy" in his early days, and "corrupt" later when Jews and Christians rejected him as a prophet.
I would love to know the citations so I can see if these things are attributable to Muhammad at all and if so, when.
2006-11-27 22:30:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Freedom 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Injil refers to euangelion, the good news.
But I doubt it refers to 'new century good news'/'inert gas created good news'. The Hadith contained a 40 feet Adam though.
It should be noted most of the churches in Mecca during the days of Muhammad are the Eastern churches.
'Religious' 'Jews' and 'Christians' (the same as 'religious' 'Muslims') rejected Muhammad as a nabi/navifrom the very days he started to deliver the messages, the same thing happened between the separatists/Pharisees and Jesus.
2006-11-28 06:58:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by E A C 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
We believe in Torah and Gospel . We believe in the Bible which was reveled to Prophet Jesus . Quran is the word of God , The God of Jesus and the God of Moses .
"Surely this is what was in thier books before , Books of Jesus and Moses" [Quran]
2006-11-28 04:45:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The Ingeel is referred to as the old testament.The new testament was compiled by man to suit man so how on earth can you call a man made book word of God ?
2006-11-28 04:51:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sherzade 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey man! dont blame us now. Muslims didnt corrupt your bible. go ask whoever put it together in books.
we believe in the Gospel of Jesus. do you have that? no i dont think you do.
it's not really our problem. do your homework and you'll find out it's corrupted, hence the so many versions. (versions not translations)
2006-11-28 05:03:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The christians are people of the book. Corruption is in all religions.
2006-11-28 04:56:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where did you get that idea from, what Muslim have you heard call the word of God corrupt?
2006-11-28 04:48:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by budding author 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quraan said that their was a holy book given to Moses and Jesus,,, but didn't say that they are holy till now ( i mean after rewriting these holy books)
2006-11-28 05:36:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Truth Seeker 2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
QURAN is the only WORD OF GOD in ORIGINAL/PURE FORM. Reason is clear in the verse below, that GOD promised to protect QURAN.
[15:9] Absolutely, we have revealed the reminder, and, absolutely, we will preserve it.
2006-11-28 04:46:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by A2Z 4
·
1⤊
0⤋