BECAUSE IT CONTAINS TRUTH WHICH WILL ROCK THE FALSE CHRISTAIN CONCEPTs.
Gospel of Barnabas was one the several gospels which the chruch tried to destroy.But it survived.
Do u you this Gospel contain PROPHESY OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD(peace be upon him)
Look at this:------It contains the reference of Muhammad(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) by name throuh Jesus(peace be upon him).
QUOTE STARTS:
Then Jesus said: 'So secret is predestination, O brethren, that I say to you, truly, only to one man shall it be clearly known. He it is whom the nations look for, to whom the secrets of God are so clear that, when he comes into the world, blessed shall they be that shall listen to his words, because God shall overshadow them with his mercy even as this palm-tree overshadows us. Yes, even as this tree protects us from the burning heat of the sun, even so the mercy of God will protect from Satan them that believe in that man.'
The disciples answered, "O Master, who shall that man be of whom you speak, who shall come into the world?" Jesus answered with joy of heart: 'He is Muhammad;, Messenger of God, and when he comes
into the world, even as the rain makes the earth to bear fruit when for a long time it has not rained, even so shall he be occasion of good works among men, through the abundant mercy which he shall bring. For he is a white cloud full of the mercy of God, which mercy God shall sprinkle upon the faithful like rain.'
QUOTE ENDS.
2006-11-27 17:44:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The History channel had a special on last night about the books that were not included in the bible we have today. The books that were excluded was in part a decision made by the council of Nicea. Some could not be confirmed as authentic. Other reasons included the disagreements by the council on what people could & could not understand, etc.
Looking back now, many are starting to see they do give credence & at minimum, new perspectives & things to ponder.
2006-11-27 17:35:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Vyctorya 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
evaluate this large quote from the real Barnabas whose epistle (A.D.60-75) replaced into got here upon completely preserved in the manuscript of the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus: “because of the fact they shall see Him then in that day having a scarlet gown approximately his physique all the way down to his ft; and that they shall say, isn't this He whom we as quickly as despised, and pierced, and mocked, and crucified? quite that's He who then declared Himself to be the Son of God (Epistle of Barnabas bankruptcy VII). right that's the real question why do those 2 Barnabas writings conflict one yet another lots in the event that they're certainly an analogous author, and why does the faster writings of Barnabas make no point out of Allah, Muhammad, or Muslim? They the two could be got here upon incorrect yet the two would be unable to be got here upon proper.
2016-12-13 15:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there were thousands of religious books at the time the council voted for the current compiling of the bible.. Since we were not there, we have no idea what their "standard" of what goes in or is left out was.. I guess they voted for what they felt was the best for their ideals at that time.. I wish we could see and read the other books during that time to make a more modern compliation during this time... Would some council today vote the same books in as they did then?...
2006-11-27 17:33:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mintee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't that a dog??
oh right st bernard!
2006-11-27 17:31:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by trouserman 1
·
0⤊
0⤋