Technically, that would be an agnostic but that is only because of the final part of your question.
If the reason someone does not make a decision about god is that they are confused by the various concepts and definitions the many, many different religions have for god, that's only weak thinking and weak thinking is not the exclusive reserve of agnostics. Atheists and Theists can count very high numbers of weak thinking people among their ranks, too.
I am an agnostic, but I'm not confused. The definition of agnostic includes those who have decided that the existence of God, much less the nature of God, CANNOT be known and IS NOT known by anyone.
Those people who claim to have knowledge that God doesn't exist are simply wrong. They do not know that and they cannot know that. Similarly, those people who claim to know God does exist are also wrong for the same reason. Atheists, at least, don't elaborate on their mistake and go on to invent adventure stories about things they know nothing about and become violent and insulting towards people who suggest they might not be true.
2006-11-27 19:43:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by C Lights 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Such vast questions are complicated to reply to even for realized human beings. i imagine the present findings of quantum physics say obviously that reason isn't needed and so the universe got here into being through the large Bang all through itself. So does that advise God also ought to were there all through itself. the debate rages and not using a passable rationalization. faith is the needed theory which varieties the theory of technological knowledge to boot as faith. it really is severe time that we provide up arguing and settle for it. in case you want to comprehend it extra valuable then look on the God fable debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox. Their arguments are a lot extra consistent and knowledgeable than what we do the following on Yahoo R&S.
2016-10-16 10:49:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by pipe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Born-again agnostic! (born and brought up Christian, but once I started seeing the holes and gaping flaws in Christianity there wass no going back)
2006-11-27 19:19:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by AgProv 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the term is agnostic. and while on the subject I have to tell this joke. It's kinda funny: Did you hear about the agnostic,dyslexic,insomniac? ................. he stays up all night pondering the existence of Dog.
2006-11-27 17:00:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Infidel 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lost
2006-11-27 17:05:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pamela 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
They are agnostic.....
One who has an idea... but doubts... looking for concrete evidence, they are.... but being in doubt, they are agnostic.....
So, they say there is no existence because they see nothing.....
Your sister,
Ginger
2006-11-27 16:59:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Agnostic, as opposed to atheist.
2006-11-27 17:28:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by jinz 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Agnostic... again
2006-11-27 16:58:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by impossble_dream 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Infadel
2006-11-27 16:58:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gary M 4
·
0⤊
6⤋
sinner will do
2006-11-27 16:57:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by cork 7
·
0⤊
6⤋