English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Since they don't have a day care license, probably not.
OJ was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money not narcissism was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received many millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.

2006-11-27 18:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0 1

One - no cause Michael Jackson is just plain alien looking.
Two - no cause the size of OJ would probably also frighten my kids.

2006-11-27 17:59:00 · answer #2 · answered by VeronicaS 2 · 0 1

Hmm I don't open a day care center I have much more important things to do than that!

MJ

2006-11-28 16:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by Jessica 4 · 0 0

I don't leave my kids with anyone except my mother (not even friends or other relatives)! It has nothing to do with MJ cause I know he's innocent!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

2006-11-27 19:30:24 · answer #4 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0 0

Of course not Michael Jackson can not be trusted when it comes to babysitting anyhow who would probaly spome kind of idiot would do that

2006-11-27 18:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by bbgurl5036 2 · 0 1

no way. never. neither of them seem like they'd be very responsible taking care of kids, with all the weird personality traits, molestation and murder charges they've had.

2006-11-27 18:05:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

HELL NO!!! You know what's funny? I was just gonna ask 2 questions. One about O.J. and the other about M.J. Ha Ha.

2006-11-27 17:56:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I wouldn't because I don't trust daycares period. That, and I don't have a kid.

2006-11-27 17:55:22 · answer #8 · answered by JASNJ 2 · 1 0

Sure, I'd bet they'd have cheap rates.

2006-11-27 17:56:32 · answer #9 · answered by E B 5 · 0 2

no i would not i just would not trust them with one of my children but i dont have any children anyways

2006-11-27 18:02:58 · answer #10 · answered by mickymousegrl 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers