English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The brits always seem to get this kind of thing right. Should the US follow?

2006-11-27 07:04:39 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

23 answers

Yes, the U.S. should follow. I believe we should teach science in our science rooms, not speculation and bias. That is something better left for home or church.

Right on, mother country.

2006-11-27 07:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by hvjhv 3 · 3 1

As there is no scientific basis for creationism, or intelligent design, then it should not be taught as science. I have no problem with it being taught in religious education where it belongs, as long as it is taught as part of a belief system, rather than as a theory.

We are already seeing what is happening in america with the rise of creationism, carefully hidden under the guise of ID, we don't want the same happening here.

2006-11-27 15:10:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Of course religious beliefs have no place in a science curriculum, and yes the US should follow (if the Dover case hasn't already knocked creationism on the head there).

2006-11-27 15:16:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes

2006-11-27 15:08:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely. Sadly, it will never happen, because people don't understand science very well here, and use the "Well, it is just a theory so shouldn't we teach other theories too?" line of reasoning, not knowing what the term theory means in science.

2006-11-27 16:11:51 · answer #5 · answered by Captain Hammer 6 · 1 0

Yes. It only belongs in a comparative religion, philosophy, or social studies class. Science classes shoud teach science!

.

2006-11-27 15:33:53 · answer #6 · answered by Dawn G 6 · 2 0

Yes and yes. Religion doesn't belong in a science class.

2006-11-27 15:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Yes, everyone should have outgrown this nonsense by now.
You can learn and practice morality w/o being coerced by the threats and bribes offered by religion.

2006-11-27 15:11:25 · answer #8 · answered by big j 5 · 0 0

Well, I don't think there should be a written law against it. There probably isn't a law against teaching other fairy tales in science class. Common sense should tell you that it doesn't need to be in science class.

2006-11-27 15:07:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Rather so. Intelligent, educated people can differentiate religion and science.

2006-11-27 15:11:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers