2006-11-27 03:13:12 · 7 answers · asked by dileep 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
I like the idea. It might be better to have the contributions be like ownig shares and having everyone be some sort of corporate officer. That way - all your donors can write off their expenses and you can still accomplish your mission.
Also if anything goes wrong - you can declare Bankruptcy and get a huge government bailout (like Delta does for 25 years) or Enron or Worldcom.
2006-11-28 10:37:32 · answer #1 · answered by iyamwutiam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea of a global fund is not a new one.
There is already a GOBAL FUND to fight Aids, to combat poverty and then recently in a conference held at halifax, nova scotia a global fund to support the microfinance initiative.
2006-11-27 17:08:08 · answer #2 · answered by Manueldatu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its called a charitable organization. There are quite a few of them already. Most of them are much more efficient than government programs that claim to work toward the same goals.
2006-11-27 21:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Complete the question looking at social and ...what you dunder head
Never worked for commies or scummy socialist
Keep your socialist B S
2006-11-27 12:48:16 · answer #4 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And how long will it take your company to become bankrupt?
If you want to help people - you create jobs and opportunity by creating successful business.
2006-11-27 13:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I've been suggesting that to Democrats for years. It seems that they would rather take from the public coffers, though.
2006-11-27 11:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why?
2006-11-27 18:13:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋