Children of the British empire?

Question

You know as you look at Englands great former empire. It has many children. Let me explain...

The United States the big brother told its parent the UK I hate you and moved out, later they went on a world "talk show" and made up ie WW1 and WW2.

Canada is the gay child that during family reunions you dont talk to. And England just says what did we do wrong?

Australia is the funny brother who is drunk all the time and plays with dangerous animals and is the life of the party.

India would be the adopted child and went off on its own by not eating.

Im sure there are some more but I cant think of any. Do you agree or disagree?

Answer 1

We( Canada) lost 2 more of our "GAY" solders today in Afghanistan , You A**hole. We have lost more in Afghanistan than the UK, and %wise the US. We weren't behind the illigal war in Iraq. As far as I'm concerned we should not be in Afghanistan, the US created the problem by backing the Taliban, and now they are backing the Northern Alliance, another group of warlords.

Some food for thought, if you are capable of it,

Today marks the day that you will have been in Iraq longer than the US was in all of World War II. Canada had been there since Sept/39

That's right. We, with the help of the allies, especially Russia, were able to defeat all of Nazi Germany, Mussolini, and the entire Japanese empire in LESS time than it's taken the world's only superpower to secure the road from the airport to downtown Baghdad.

And we haven't even done THAT. After 1,347 days, in the same time it took us to took us to sweep across North Africa, storm the beaches of Italy, conquer the South Pacific, and liberate all of Western Europe, we cannot, after over 3 and 1/2 years, even take over a single highway and protect ourselves from a homemade device of two tin cans placed in a pothole. No wonder the cab fare from the airport into Baghdad is now running around $35,000 for the 25-minute ride. And that doesn't even include a friggin' helmet.

Is this utter failure the fault of our troops? Hardly. That's because no amount of troops or choppers or democracy shot out of the barrel of a gun is ever going to "win" the war in Iraq. It is a lost war, lost because it never had a right to be won, lost because it was started by men who have never been to war, men who hide behind others sent to fight and die.

Let's listen to what the Iraqi people are saying, according to a recent poll conducted by the University of Maryland:

** 71% of all Iraqis now want the U.S. out of Iraq.

** 61% of all Iraqis SUPPORT insurgent attacks on U.S. troops.

Yes, the vast majority of Iraqi citizens believe that our soldiers should be killed and maimed! So what the hell are we still doing there? Talk about not getting the hint.

Obviously the Allies must have done a hell of a lot more than you give us Credit for.

Answer 2

England was not happy with the way the united states turned, they saw them as a big bully, but decided to join them, so England still would appear well mannered. Australia said, the hell with it, lets party, they will mess it up anyways. India decided , once they got England's tea, they didn't need them anymore. Canada decided they did not want anybody and decided to become peace activists.i don't necessarily agree on your stance, and found it a very interesting and candid approach and enjoyed reading it thanks make sure to read brainys answer which is very informative

Answer 3

Yes i agree but i would also say that the Brits are always drunk and start fights.

Answer 4

What about the New Zealanders??? Are they the child with the drug problem???? (one of the highest rates of pot usage in the western world).....LOL

Answer 5

all facts of an imperialist nation

Answer 6

children of britis

Answer 7

"Ur Engish right!", I can tell. ha ha ha.