Soul, of course.
Body is temporary and soul is eternal.
2006-11-26 19:51:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Devotee 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
If you are A Christian the Bible teaches you very early that human beings have no soul, they ARE souls. Genesis 2: God breathed into him and Adam became a living soul. This is confirmed in other places in the Bible e.g. Paul. The idea of a soul was used by Plato and the Catholic Church adopted it with great enthusiasm. If you have a soul which can be sent to hell they can scare you no end. And the sky pilots live very nicely because of that. Study for yourself and be skeptical where big money rears its ugly side.
BTW: the temperature in hell, a lake of brimstone and fire, works out at 784 degrees Kelvin. Pretty cool compared to the Sun.
2006-11-26 20:02:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus said in Matt 10:28 do not fear the those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. I am on the side of Jesus' saying that saving the soul is more important, because by doing that my body is saved as well.
2006-11-26 20:02:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by seekfind 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The body is just a trap the soul is stuck in,also some bodies do a lot of harm.
2006-11-26 19:55:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by gwhiz1052 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Soul is relative. I'm not particularly worried about my soul.
2006-11-26 19:56:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Soul and body are not mind to give or destory.
As this body's God's,I would save both.
If i must choose one,I would choose my soul....
2006-11-26 19:52:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by chilling_1ce 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
well if you put it that way! me too!
but our souls are already saved. ONLY the sons of perdition are lost
if you had 2 terrorists each holding a gun at the head of your wife and your daughter and they said You can only choose one to live, which would you choose?
2006-11-26 19:51:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am incappable of saving my soul, only Christ can do that.
That being said I would much rather have my soul saved than my body.
2006-11-26 19:52:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by AirborneSaint 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm pretty sure I don't have a soul, but if you do, I recommend saving it
2006-11-26 19:52:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rob C. 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
well, i suppose since i can prove that my body exists, i would go for saving my body. when you can show me beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a soul, then ask me again.
2006-11-26 19:52:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by odieman_3 2
·
1⤊
2⤋