Did you personally see any evidence of voter fraud, intimidation, or machine errors in Nov. 7, 2006 vote?

Answer 1

Republican fraud was rampant here in Indiana

Answer 2

I didn't. I worked at the polls, so I was there all day. The only problem we had was that the precinct boundaries had changed since the last election. We were able to direct everyone to the correct polling place and everyone knew how to find the correct location when told the address. A few people mentioned some people passing out fliers 101 ft from the door. 100 ft is the legal limit. No one said they were intimidating anyone. ID requirements were new this year in my state. We had maybe 2 people who voted provisional ballots because they did not have acceptable ID.

Answer 3

What about fraud interior the 2012 GOP primaries? An ABC associate with the help of threat printed the end results of the Illinois regularly taking place the day previously the regularly taking place. Why hasn't FOX training or any training said that tale? there have been Republicans and Democrats convicted of voter fraud interior the 2008 election, sure. i'm particular as a partisan gadget you'll in straightforward words correct conventional the Cali Republican who replaced into convicted.

Answer 4

We did here in my town. I ran as a Democrat for town council and won, but my running mate (there were two seats open) won by only won vote and now there is a recount. In the district that is typically Democrat, the machines broke and people were turned away. The poll workers didn't ask if they wanted to vote by provisional ballot or not, just told them that they had to come back later. How many of them never came back? They should have been allowed to vote by provisional ballot since the machines broke.

In the districts that typically voted Republican, there were no problems with voting.

Answer 5

No. My precinct didn't use Diebold machines.

And unless the above DRO was in Arizona, she broke the law by asking for proof of citizenship to vote. (And as for her "double voting" person, their first ballot would have been provisional, and would have come up as a duplicate if counted later.)

However, here's a website where you can find links to people who did see some, and federal investigations of same:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/11/348846.shtml

Answer 6

No. Not a one. I went in, showed my ID, signed on the line, filled in my circles, and submitted my ballot. Then I went home and cried since pretty much everyone I voted for lost. :(

Answer 7

nope - our county has a great supervisor of elections and staffs each precinct with about the same number of Democrats, Republicans and Independents (no party affiliation)

any sign offs must have one signature from each group to witness any documents - and we are protected

Answer 8

Yes, I worked as a DRO and when I refused one lady due to lack of proof of citizenship, she left but returned about an hour later and went to another table, said her oath and voted.

I also heard about another claiming not to be on the list, got put on, voted, and then went to another location (where they were on the list) and voted again

Answer 9

No, and I was proud of my countrymen flooding to the poles, even those that opposed issues I defend. Let the peoples will prevail!

Answer 10

No and obviously from the answers neither did anyone else. Why lie about something like this? You hurt yourself and your country no matter what part of the political spectrum your opinion lies in.

Answer 11

yes

Lieberman ran as an independent here in Connecticut and now he is counted as a democrat in the Senate. To sum it up there were 2 Democrats on the Senate ballot here no matter how it was worded. the same thing happened in New Hampshire.