proof of financial stability, IQ tests, and psychological exams before people are allowed to reproduce?

Question

I think so, do you?

Answer 1

I agree to a extent, the IQ test thing is a bit much maybe a common sense test would make more sense! Also financial stability I would consider but a not a "high" income level, possibly no poverty above welfare, you know. I also think having a married couple should be criteria, but none of this Will ever happen...we live in a free country!

Answer 2

Yes, sort of. While the validity of IQ tests is questionable anyone in the adverage range of 90-110 should recieve an okay. While the adverage person is a complete moron, it is debated how much intelligence is genetic and how much is not. Besides, the world does need it's grunt workers and monkeys.

Psychological exams sounds okay as long as we are not talking about mental illness. If someone has a serious mental illness say bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, I do not believe that stops them from being an able parent. The psychological exam should consist strictly of parental ability and desire to be a parent. It might also include a practical section on parental ability and simple know how.

Financial stability, again, as long as someone is above the poverty line they should be able to breed. Anyone on welfare, social security checks or whatever, should fix themselves up a bit before breeding.

Some of your answerers see this as extreme. It's either because they assume your question means only the super rich, super smart and perfectly sane people can breed or they are inadequate parents who cannot think outside of black and white extremes. This is not how I take it. I would want these tests to be in the grey area. This is how it should be. People do have the ability to change and improve themselves. Someone who fails the test should be able to repeat sections of the test. One can raise their IQ level as well as work on their financial and psycholocal stability. If anything these sorts of policies would give breeders a more important goal than the simple and animalistic one of 'knocking up their wives or getting knocked up', the goal would be to improve themselves and hopefully raise a human being worth being in this world as opposed to these mindless morons we've got running around. Then again, the mindless morons do have their purposes, use wisely.

Answer 3

You are very ignorant. First did you ever think that maybe some of these people had good jobs at one time and got layed off. Not fired but layed off of work because the companies couldn't afford to keep all of them or better they had some physical problems that was not there before. Second IQ tests, What you think everybody has to be a genius just to have a child. You are prejudice. Some people happen to have a very good mind and then later on in life have a mental disease that is not their own fault. Do you think people actually want to be stupid, with no income and mental? I think you need to take a glance in the mirror, because people like you make it hard for people to live.

Answer 4

No way! This is the sort of thing Hitler wanted to do in creating his master race. We were unsuccesful in banning alcohol back in the twenties and you want to ban certain people only from sex?
It couldn't be enforced if it were law and there would be plenty of crooked people offering passing grades in all categories for cash.
Financial stability changes from year to year, psychologists will tell you that theirs is not an exact science and the tests are even less reliable and What has IQ got to do with it? How smart do you have to be? It just would not work.

Answer 5

I don't agree to that at all. Having children is a choice, and I don't believe that there should be standards such as listed above in order to regulate who can have offspring. Tests like this prohibit "normal" people from having children. There are lots of people out there who don't fit one of the criteria listed above and I think it's ludacris that we as a government should be allowed to say who can and who can't reproduce. There are plenty of studies out there that prove that people who don't meet one of the expectations listed above still provide a stable financial, emotional and physical environment for children. And yet, there are studies out there where rich, smart and sane people have children who turn out to be murderers, rapists, etc...

Answer 6

expensive Captain Nemo: i understand this is crowded on that submarine, yet in spite of this, your proposed standards are not going to artwork. All kidding aside -- how could you enforce that? could you sterilize each male at beginning and not opposite the technique till he could supply data of financial stability, IQ point and psychological examination outcomes? i'm beginning with the boys because of the fact this is much less complicated to render them quickly sterile than it somewhat is to hire an identical technique on women human beings. the only situation with it somewhat is that with the aid of delaying procreation, you're dropping the finest years, not in basic terms in terms of ease of progenitation, yet additionally in terms of high quality of the youngster. there's a greater robust occurrence of genetic abnormalities, eg Down Syndrome, with older mom and dad, so the optimal time to reproduce is interior the early 1920s. Few human beings at that age could meet your standards.

Answer 7

IQ test? That's a bit much but I kind of agree on the others to a point.

Answer 8

1.Yes to finacial stability...
2.I.Q.= to what standards? so that's questionable..you do not have to know the square root of 9 to Love and be a good parent.
3.Psychological Exams.....ABSOLUTELY!

Answer 9

I agree..but if this was to happen just think how the population would drop drastically !!! LOL

Answer 10

This idea is not new and is Pure Evil