All muslims are not terrorists and all terrosits are not muslims. Men at various time in history have resorted to violence in the name of God. There have always been men who believed in the power of sword and there always have been men who believed in the power of love. The fact that the world has survived till date proves that the believers of love have till now been more successful than believers in blood.
All of us who believe in Love are stopping those who belive in blood by loving those around us.
2006-11-27 02:00:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by krafts_india 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well. They have been doing it to others for 1400 years. It has taken the rest of us 1400 years and several wars, millions killed, raped and tortured before we came to the realisation that they were discriminating against us.
So why are they complaining? Either they want to be aggressors or victims. They just do not stop do they? Why dont they start giving back what they have stolen and let others live too.
Muslims are selfish. They only want rights for themselves.
They do not want to give equal rights to other people who do not believe in their Allah and their religion.
Can you imagine how the world would be if they were the only ones allowed to thrive and have all they want and all of us are killed by them in the process?
If you are really interested in a clearer picture of their violent ways, you must read history and see how they will cut your throat without even thinking in some countries and yet come to the western countries and become victims.
I am not saying this. IT is written in history books.
2006-11-26 14:35:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by crazy s 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Islam is the most dangerous religion there is. If you MUST have a religion, try Bhuddism. If you are educated and free-thinking, try Atheism - that's by far the best option.
For more ammunition against Islam try www.prophetmohammed.com.uk and be prepared to be shocked.
In answer to your question, I cannot personally take any action to prevent world-wide slaughter in the name of a false and imaginary deity. Neither can the individual 'good' muslim. There has to be BIG action from the muslim society but we all know where that would end, more fatwahs and more killings and that is why they are keeping their heads down.
ATHEISM - THE LOGICAL CHOICE
2006-11-26 14:41:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nobody cares about the Muslims, only the radical Muslims that are causing all the trouble. The radical Muslims use it as an excuse for blowing up people, and for an excuse to try and take over the world. No one is against their religion, it is the radical Muslims that are against their own religion that is why they changed it, they change it for power and for the devils work. Their goal as in the 7th century is to take over the world and destroy it if they have to. If they had nukes right now they would use them. And they wouldn't care how many Muslims they killed in the process.
2006-11-26 14:33:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by hexa 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
We talk out all the time against terrorism. Its not like they would listen to us, they would kill us too. I will try harder. For the record I have no problem with Muslims who are getting prosecuted and fight for self defense.
We don't see things as you see it. I don't see them as giving Islam a "bad name." The media has had no affect on Islam. I am only sad that there are innocents on both sides going through intense pain that's my concern.
2006-11-26 14:32:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Muse 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like the idea of discriminating against murdering scum who say God told them to kill innocent people. I read the koran. It even tells muslim men to beat their wives in surah 4:34. Islam gives itself a bad name, and it's time for the civilized world to wake up to the fact that islam has never, nor ever will be, peaceful.
2006-11-26 14:29:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Extremist can not be a muslim.It is against the holy Islam.First & last thing to do to accept the reality openly in the society & to oppose the ill events & the people those are doing it.
2006-11-26 14:53:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by nik 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi (((Eartha))) Is making a sweeping generalization discriminatory? i don't think of so. Inflammatory sure. Counterproductive, sure, although that's no longer discriminatory. Discrimination will be to circumvent a muslim getting a job even although they were the perfect qualified. I even might want to say that from my time right here in R&S I actually have discovered to be extra distrustful of persons in faith than previously. I do, although, have 2 acquaintances right here in NZ that are muslim. that's extremely unusual as there are very very few followers of Islam in my usa. I even might want to say that that couple are 2 of the most lovable those who that's been my privilege to understand, yet I nevertheless despise their faith. i ask your self how lengthy our friendship will very last after we've a frank discuss our non secular perspectives? If mainstream Islam were to be a touch extra self severe, then i'd average my perspectives, although the debacle over the hot all of us Draw Muhammad Day adventure shows Islam in undesirable mild: risky, divisive, parochial contained in the acute and unable to tolerate valid criticism. a similar applies to Zionism and fundamentalist Christian conception - for the record. You made the point that there is not any huge difference between making a racial slur and making a slur hostile to Islam. I disagree. One won't be able to help the colour of the exterior in which one is born, yet with functional preparation and the employing of mind ability, you probable can substitute one's non secular and social perspectives. no matter if one might want to is up for debate. the placement lies with Islamic clerics' intolerance in the route of any attitude except their personal (to wit, Pakistan's censorship of facebook, the sanctioned demise threats hostile to Salman Rushdie...). This makes that discuss no longer attainable on a huge scale. Am I conflating Islamic administration with all followers of Allah? probable, yet there are center values in the religion that carry authentic otherwise it does no longer be a efficient faith. The center values of all efficient religions have a aspect of belligerence in the route of competing faiths. till religions of all stripes tone themselves down somewhat, i will proceed to hate faith, yet like the non secular. i will also proceed to make generalist statements about faith because there truly isn't any opposite direction to attack the topics.
2016-11-29 19:58:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by papen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its kind of narrow thinking to think of 1.9 Billion as extremists. Islam is an international religion. Occupation in any country is called war where ppl go to war to liberate their country.
2006-11-26 14:51:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How are they suppossed to stop them? I'm sure the majority of Muslim people are just as shocked as the rest of us are when some terrorist attacks happen. (I'm talking about here in America--- in Iraq they are probobly not shocked when terror happens) But even in that case--- what are they suppossed to do? are they mind readers?
I feel sorry for them. It only takes a couple of bad apples to ruin the bunch. It should not be that way.
2006-11-26 14:40:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by liberty_brooks 1
·
1⤊
0⤋