Edgar Cayce yes ... a lot of evidence to say otherwise
Nostradamus ... hmmm .. some ... but too much is open to interpretation on hindsight
2006-11-26 09:11:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Peace 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My personal reaction to Edgar Cayce was that when he went into a trance, while sleeping(which was why he was called the sleeping prophet) was he was seeing a different dimension of earth, not this one. Mainly because he predicted that the west coast of America would break off or sink in the year 2001 and that the east coast would disappear about a year later in the twinkling of an eye. Nostradamus was the same type, but I think he understood somewhat what he was perceiving. He could predict hundreds of years into the future about most things in this reality, but not in all realities.
2006-11-26 09:11:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Cayce was real at the start, and then started believing his own PR, so he got sort of strange at the end. He did give a lot of help in the Lindbergh case, if they had paid attention to what he said.
Nostradamus was too far back to be relevant now; it's mostly stuff that you could make mean anything.
2006-11-26 09:05:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Baby'sMom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is somewhat some those that purchase into his artwork. I visited the Edgar Cayce midsection and tried to appreciate what the hype became approximately. I purely think of human beings have been analyzing extra into it than mandatory.
2016-10-17 14:07:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cayce definitely had the power of insight.
Nostradamus on the other hand is more of a coincidence. I mean after all people are saying he predicted this or that after it's already happened. Just like the Da'Vinci code. If they actually took one of his quatrains and said that this is going to happen on such and such a date maybe I would believe it.
2006-11-26 09:10:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by bartman40467 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fake Fake Fake just like Jesus and Mohammed and John Edward from crossing over.
2006-11-26 09:10:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fake.
2006-11-26 09:04:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Evil Atheist Conspirator 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I couldn't say for sure; who could? The mystic in me hopes there is something to it all, but I hope things won't be nearly as grim as they've predicted.
2006-11-26 09:08:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by anita.revolution 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
HE WAS THE REAL DEAL. VERY GIFTED, BUT SINCE I'VE BEEN OFFICIALOLY BORN AGAIN I DO QUESTION SOME OF THE THINGS HE SAID. IF FOR NO OTHER REASON I DON;T UNDERSTAND THEM.
GOD BLESS
2006-11-26 09:06:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by thewindowman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both fakes.
2006-11-26 09:08:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by norhollywud 1
·
0⤊
0⤋