I am athiest but when I disputed that man evolved from primate my question was deleted by Yahoo. Why?

Question

I had only made the statement. Because I said I dispute that mankind evolved from primates.

It was a question don't bull me

I asked why my free thought question that I believe was deleted. I did not ask for a long letter of the when dinosaurs roamed the earth. Maybe atheism has a bible of it's own that no one is not allowed to think outside of.

what stinks the most I KNOW it was not the religious that reported me.

Answer 1

Hello evilushun... :)

It had to do with someone hitting the abuse button..some here just do not like others answers, so they freely hit the button.. :(

I had made a statement concerning a completely different question on here, someone reported me for abuse..even though there were 3 others, with the same exact answer.. :(

When I got the violation I had been reported saying it was not a question, nor an answer..

I am so sorry that your answer was deleted.. :(

In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ.. :)

Answer 2

You were probably making a statement instead of asking a question.
Also how can you dispute that humans evolved from primates. We are primates. There had to be lesser primates along the evolution trail. Where you're confused is in thinking all primates are monkeys, apes, gorillas, etc.
Darwin said that people evolved from lesser types. At one stage humans may have been ape-like. That's a heck of a lot different than saying we were apes at one time.
Both the great apes and humans started way back as single cell beings. Each evolved into what we have today. Apes will not evolve into humans. Humans did not evolve from apes.

Answer 3

confident, quite some examples of transitional hominin fossils. there is not any lacking link - it somewhat is an previous fallacy. In Evolution, each era of each inhabitants is effectively a 'link'. Fossilisation is a uncommon journey, quite in environments the place carcasses are right now degraded with the aid of scavengers. It desires in basic terms the the final option variety of geological journey (working example, a surprising layer of volcanic ash) to create one in all those fossil, and you will think of how uncommon those events are. None the less, diligent searchers HAVE got here across, and proceed to discover hominin fossils in Africa. particularly some the transition between those fossils is so average, that anthropologists can not pick on the the final option taxonomy and naming for them. working example, 2 fossils would be so comparable that they'd't pick no count if or not they could the two or the two be classed as australopithecus, homo, afarensis, habilis, rudolfensis, etc. it somewhat is super - it demonstrates the gradualism of evolution, this is what you may wish to be sure. So, my data. seem on the link under. It in basic terms lists a brilliant style of the main important hominin unearths to date. Casts of a few of those could be considered in maximum solid museums. The originals would be in a much off museum. that may not undemanding middle data. EDIT: Apollo. end making it up. seem at my link. What you declare isn't real - there are a number of transitional fossils. working example, seem on the Australopithecines. They walked upright in a bipedal style, yet with a ideas no greater advantageous than a fashionable-day chimp. 0.5 human, 0.5 'ape' in case you like. there's a team of un-lacking links for you. it somewhat is a fundamentalist religious misinform say there is not any data. this is there interior the museums. i've got provided a link. seem. end the chant of denial.

Answer 4

Yahoo doesn't actually have any human moderators. It's just a program that will automatically delete you question if it gets reported enough. I don't think anyone even works there. Just a big computer that is running everything.

Answer 5

Because people are primates you primate.

Origin of man

A different model proposes that a small, relatively isolated population of early humans evolved into modern Homo sapiens, and that this population succeeded in spreading across Africa, Europe, and Asia -- displacing and eventually replacing all other early human populations as they spread. In this scenario the variation among modern populations is a recent phenomenon. Part of the evidence to support this theory comes from molecular biology, especially studies of the diversity and mutation rate of nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA in living human cells.From these studies an approximate time of divergence from the common ancestor of all modern human populations can be calculated. This research has typically yielded dates around 200,000 years ago, too young for the "Multiregional Hypothesis." Molecular methods have also tended to point to an African origin for all modern humans, implying that the ancestral population of all living people migrated from Africa to other parts of the world -- thus the name of this interpretation: the "Out of Africa Hypothesis."
Whichever model (if either) is correct, the oldest fossil evidence for anatomically modern humans is about 130,000 years old in Africa, and there is evidence for modern humans in the Near East sometime before 90,000 years ago.

Answer 6

They are a little tight on that delete button. I also had a question deleted:

Should the existance of god be debated on the hit show "the Myth Busters"?

The reason it was deleted is bucause I used another user's handle in one of my additional details. Amazing, but I thought it was irresponsible of Y!A

Answer 7

Your belief is flawed and proven wrong by the available evidence but that isn't a good reason to delete your question. I doubt there was some other issue involved that someone found offensive.

Answer 8

When fear something we have a tendency to fight it tooth and nail buddy. Even though your an Athiest, and your beliefs are yours, people have a tendency to push away anything that is different from theirs. I don't believe the same as you, but I agree that you have a right to your beliefs

Answer 9

Well the Yahoo moderaters must hate modertaing this section.

Do we remove the nutto, or the guys who says he's nuts?

As for evolution, it's a metter of a theory with strong evidence. Lack of 100% evidence does not mean creationism (with 0 evidence) is more likely.

http://flushaholybook.com

Answer 10

Yahaoo kiked out my friend Mr. Thomas Alva Eddison. I hate Yahooo..