I agree just because Oprah is famous that dose not mean she is above the rules.
2006-11-26 04:12:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by East Bay Punk 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
well it does sound strange that Oprah would do that where would she have the time to start with. I was wondering the same thing myself as some of you were was this Oprah or improper. The real Oprah would not do this. but if it is not Oprah she would. I believe you should not go around saying you someone you not, I think that is entire possible. When you have a lot you are require to give a lot so to me she has done nothing wrong by giving her money away. I rather have someone that willing to give there money than someone that rich that keep there money. I love her to death I love someone that gives. I don't think she any better than me and she not saying that she trying to get us all involved. She quiet a lady. Is she trying to get us to watch her show I don't know. if you worried report her she have violations trust me they will find out if she the real Opera or if she spammering. I hope you wrong that won't happen.
2006-11-26 08:34:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is it considered spam to add a link and point the "asker" to another website when we answer a question? Oprah's suggestion that we can find more information on this topic by watching her show is just that. It's outside the norm, to be sure, but it's just another venue for seeing how people answer the question.
I'm really surprised at the criticism being leveled at Oprah here. Can any of us say that we exercise generosity or live a "pay it forward" lifestyle to the extent she has done and continues to do? I choose to believe that she lives by a simple creed: To whom much is given, much is expected (Luke 12:48)
I think I've seen her show maybe 3-4 times, but I continue to count myself among her millions of admirers.
2006-11-26 04:33:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by princessmeltdown 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I disagree that Oprah's question is SPAM. The idea here is to create dialogue, and perhaps, by studying all of the answers, you find one. Her public image just adds interest to the idea that all sorts of people are looking for answers.
Spam doesn't have the same effects.
2006-11-26 14:37:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeffrey M 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
As far as "telling" you to watch her program, that is something left up to the individual to decide. The question was thought provoking at a time of year that alot of people wish they could give $1000 to someone just to do something nice for a perfect stranger. You and anyone else always have the opportunity to report anything as abuse if that is your wish. How do we know it is affiliated with Oprah's organization?
2006-11-26 06:04:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by coolbeans 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
For Goodness sake guy, get a spine. you're the draw close of the homestead, reduce the lady's viewing, absolutely enable her to computer screen tutorial programmes which will practice her a thanks to be a extra powerful spouse. of route the Martha Stewart books were not adequate. You were somewhat gentle allowing her to computer screen this muck contained in the first position. Slipped up there did not you?
2016-11-26 22:57:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oprah needs to eat a salad and stop whining on tv.
2006-11-26 03:36:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Arcturus R 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Whats a oprah? I like spam with eggs, I don't know abou spam with oprah, or do you mean okra?
2006-11-26 03:37:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bob 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I suppose they are. Personally, I am fully tired of Queen Oprah
2006-11-26 03:36:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
oprah is human just like the rest of us..she can asked questions or answer them just like u do..ur just jealous of her fame..leave her alone..she didnt threaten or make an degrogatory remarks to anyone.so if u dont like her thats ur problem..u dont have to answer her questions or deal with her n thats your right..but u have no right to say who can come on yahoo answers.if yahoo answers feels that her questions or statement is spam im sure that wouldnt have allowed it.
2006-11-26 11:28:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋