English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i use AA batteries, and only get like 5 pictures out of them before my camera dies. i just wanted to know if there's a battery out there that lasts longer.

2006-11-26 01:56:32 · 3 answers · asked by chanceyarmy 2 in Consumer Electronics Cameras

3 answers

See? Here's another person with a camera with no viewfinder with battery trouble. This makes 5 out of 20 questions on this matter today.

If you try Energizer e2 LITHIUM batteries, you will make out better. Also, set your monitor to turn off in the shortest time possible after taking the picture. If there is a 5 or 10 second option, choose that. The monitor is the power hog, so set your camera up to turn it off as often as possible.

I lament the passing of the optical viewfinder and I would choose almost any camera with an optical viewfinder over one that only has an LCD viewfinder. Why?

1. You never have the option of turning off the LCD and these things eat batteries for lunch and spit them out. Why do away with the option of a viewfinder that has zero electrical drain?

2. It can be difficult to see the image on an LCD in bright sunlight, even if they are "new and improved."

3. You have to hold an LCD viewer out at some distance in front of your face. This is more conspicuous than I prefer to be all the time.

4. The need to hold a camera at arms length will introduce some shake. I like the idea of stabilizing a camera against my face when I am taking a picture. This is especially important with a longer zoom lens. No wonder "image stablization" or "vibration reduction" is necessary with these cameras. Not that there's anything WRONG with IS or VR, but it is really a requirement with LCD viewfinders and telephoto lenses.

5. Using the LCD to view photos after you've taken them slows down the camera quite a bit. You can't shut of the LCD monitor and still take pictures if you don't have an optical viewfinder.

2006-11-26 06:17:53 · answer #1 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 0 0

I agree with all of the information that was written above. In addition, you are probably using AA alkaline batteries, which are bad for the camera and do not have the capacity needed to power a digital camera. You can use lithium batteries which will last longer and are disposable. These can get expensive over time. You also may want to think about buying NiMh (Nickel Metal Hydride) batteries. There will give you the long battery life that the lithium batteries do but are rechargable. They do not build up battery memory or lose their charge by sitting overtime. It ends up being cheaper in the long run. Its about $30 for a pack of 4 with the charger.

2006-11-26 10:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by ~*Amy*~ 2 · 0 0

I believe each and every of the archives that became written above. to boot, you're probable using AA alkaline batteries, that are undesirable for the digicam and don't have the flexibility needed to ability a digital digicam. you should use lithium batteries which will very last more and are disposable. those can get severe priced by the years. you also might want to pick to imagine about finding out to purchase NiMh (Nickel metallic Hydride) batteries. there provide you with the lengthy battery life that the lithium batteries do yet are rechargable. they do no longer advance battery memory or lose their charge by sitting previous established time. It finally ends up being more less costly contained in the longer time period. Its about $30 for a %. of four with the charger.

2016-11-29 19:24:08 · answer #3 · answered by gagliano 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers