Atheist like saying the word No.No God,No prophet,NO that ain't true,No we are perfect.They are a bunch of immatures.
2006-11-26 01:19:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
7⤋
Nope not proof. Here tell you what. If your God is real then have him show up outside in the parking lot and I will go down and give him a good beating.
here read and test with this: http://www.godisimaginary.com/
I know that logically it is impossible to prove a negative. If I claim that God is a Flying Spaghetti Monster or that She is an Invisible pink unicorn you can't prove it is untrue either. If you want to belief in a sky daddy then where did he come from? If you say he just was then why do I need him to explain the origin of anything, I can also say the Universe just was. No not proof at all.
2006-11-26 01:42:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Barabas 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You referred us to a 360 page.
Assad asks "My first question to the atheist will be: "What is the definition of God?" ", then talks of cultural relativism, then says "Similarly the atheist rejects the false gods and the duty of every Muslim is to present the correct concept of God which he shall Insha Allah not refuse. " He than says "(You may refer to my article, ‘Concept of God in Islam’, for more details)" I can find no such article on his website.
Atheism is not a religion, it is a non-religious belief, based fby many, including myself, on the evidence we have at hand.
What Islam entails is plainly false, therefore we can infer that Allah does not really exist after all.
However I know the concept of the Islamic Gog and have turned apostate, so I know what his God represents and have reasons for disbelief all the same.
I am a metaphysical naturalist. I reject supernatural beliefs. There is no scientific evidence of the supernatural whatsoever, even prayer has repeatedly been shown not to work. History shows that in all faiths supernatural beliefs have been used to answer material questions. Why disease? Why seperate species? What is the mind. How old is the earth? Supernatural explanations have been superceded in our advanced civilisation by natural ones. Abiogenisis, evolutuion, speciation, the brain. Not as in islam creation of man from clay, or the devil controling disease. They are outmoded concepts and the faith which attests to them should be abandoned. They are the teachings of the "prophet" - an educated man for his time byt by today's standards a freak.
The question (concerning God) arises, on whom is the burden of proof? If assad wants us to convert he must not only show us that God exists (no valid empirical proof exists btw) but also how the beliefs mentioned before (creationism, devil controling disease (end there's many more)) can be reasonably be said to outmode science.
Assad says in his science and tha Koran section (quoting his "holy" book)
"Soon We will show them our signs in the (farthest) regions (of the earth), and in their own souls, until it becomes manifest to them that this is the Truth. Is it not enough that thy Lord doth witness all things?" [Al-Quran 41:53]"
What kind of a comment is that? What are we to make of it. It's not a very well defined prediction (does assad/id understand scientific method and practice at all?)Well, for instance, how soon is soon? The religion of Islam has been around for nearly 1500 years, and still NO such signs have appeared. The reasonable person can conclude that the Koran contains falsehood, not only on the small scale mentioned here but on the large scale too. It's a massive "lie". It's a book of baloney. Utter tripe. Mankind would be better off without.
I left Islam and am glad I did. I am now an atheist (secular humanist to be precise).
Assad/id defines atheist for us:
"In my dictationary
Atheists are : n. Confused human being whose mental capacity is not good enough to believe in any fact."
Well I'll prove his dictionary to be wrong, and his mental capacity to be flawed in a major way (he can't deal with reality):
2+2 =4.
e=mc2.
Charled Darwin wrote a book called "The Origin of Species".
Doctors in the civilised world use evidence based medicine, not spittle, prayer, cupping and charms.
Richard Dawkins (Oxford PROFESSOR) recently published a book called "The God Delusion".
These are all facts (well e=mc2 is a reliable theory to something like 10000 decimal places in the macro universe). Need I do more to prove my mental capacity? And Assad/id plainly WRONG? (when he on his 360 page advocates Islamic belief as being superiour to atheism)
2006-11-26 02:00:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL.....you called that proof? Of what? Your ability to copy and paste the same mindless dribble that we've seen over and over again? Nice try but way off the mark.
2006-11-26 01:27:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's your profile, with a blog in which you spew propaganda. You make unsubstantiated assertions that derive from your RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. That isn't proof of anything, at least not by any accepted empirical standard.
2006-11-26 01:23:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zombie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, I didn't see any proof of anything on that page. You're going to have to try harder than that.
2006-11-26 01:22:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, funnily enough. You claim to be able to prove things, but you don't really say much.
2006-11-26 01:19:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is what the proof
2006-11-26 01:19:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The way you say this, makes it sound stupid. I take it English is not your fist language.
2006-11-26 01:23:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by LONGINUS 2
·
0⤊
0⤋