English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does someone living in a multi-million dollar mansion have any credibility when complaining about poor people and orphans in the world?

2006-11-26 00:54:52 · 17 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

The last time I checked, Bill Gates was not a Hollywood star.

2006-11-26 01:08:48 · update #1

Can anyone tell me when was the last time he or she washed and bandaged the sores of a leper with his or her own hands?

2006-11-26 03:20:47 · update #2

17 answers

I think she was. She didn't have the money that these Hollywood stars have but she did more, and she did it all her life. She was a blessing to our world.

2006-11-26 01:13:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Yes, people who live in multi-million dollar mansions have credibility when complaining about poor people in the world. The richer people are, the more they travel, the more of the planet Earth they see. And as celebrities they have the means to make the public aware of the poverty, hunger and disease that most of us never think about. Why fault anyone for wanting to better the lives of the impoverished and needy populations of the world, for heaven's sake?

Mother Theresa was a greater humanitarian than politicians, than senators, congressmen and Presidents, too, who actually have the power to help but don't -- why not complain about them instead?

2006-11-26 09:04:17 · answer #2 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 2 1

If there were a hell, Murder Teresa is burning in it.

She took money from thieves (Charles Keating, the S&L fraud), she spread AIDS/HIV (she insisted needles be reused, not new ones bought), she allowed people to die in agony (her "hospitals" did not treat people; she said pain and suffering was "jeebus's kiss"), she took in millions in donations but directed most of it to Rome instead of helping the poor (no doubt to help pay off victims of pedopriests), and she was the biggest hypocrite, getting five star hotel and top hospitals in Europe when the old crone was sick.

"Mother F___ing Teresa", as Penn Jillette called her, was a loathesome excuse for a human being. Anyone who thinks she was "wonderful" is woefully misinformed by a media campaign and a cult of personality. Read the facts on the witch and become informed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa#Controversy_and_critics

http://www.meteorbooks.com/
http://www.meteorbooks.com/chap1.html
(When Indian prostitutes can collect more money and give more aid to the poor than an entire worldwide catholic cult scam, you know there's something wrong.)

http://www.vhp.org/englishsite/g.Challenges/dConversion%20to%20Christianity/mother_teresa.htm

http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/religion/mother_teresa.html

http://www.cosmicbaseball.com/mteresa01.html

http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2006/07/30/story15974.asp

http://www.amazon.com/Missionary-Position-Mother-Teresa-Practice/dp/185984054X/sr=8-1/qid=1163954037/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4914108-3931153?ie=UTF8&s=books


Don't kneel before the catholic cult and swallow the lies they try to put in your face. Smother Teresa was vile and self-absorbed like no one since Kim Il Sung.


.

2006-11-26 12:00:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think most Hollywood stars who support humanitarian causes do so out of an honest desire to help people. They want to cure disease and eliminate poverty, but Mother Teresa was mainly concerned with gaining converts for the Catholic Church.

2006-11-26 09:03:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You won't like this but Mother Teresa was a fund raiser who would not even give an asprin to people she thought didn't need one. I agree that Bill Gates does more for humanity than Mother Theresa ever did.

2006-11-26 09:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by John W 2 · 2 0

A person living in a multi-million dollar mansion may not have credibility, but they have much more ability to help the poor people in the world. But will they?

2006-11-26 08:59:45 · answer #6 · answered by Smiley 5 · 2 1

That woman was a plague who collected tens of millions of dollars, ostensibly for hospices and orphanages, and spent most of it on religious organisations paying to build nunneries and employ missionaries. What was left was used to take the misery and suffering of oppressive and corrupt governments and societies and hide it from the public gaze behind walls.

There was no humanitarian purpose to what she did. She APPROVED of misery and suffering and said exactly that repeatedly. She called it HOLY, PRECIOUS and BEAUTIFUL!!

Her homes for the destitute and dying had an entrance fee of conversion from the dominant local Islamic and Hindu religions to the Catholic faith and for that all you got was to die on a camp bed in a room full of other sick and dying people instead of on the street or in a gutter where people would have to SEE it.

She was a fraud, a ghoul, a cruel and malevolent woman who should have been charged with abuse and corruption and jailed for the crimes she committed and continue to be committed, still, in her name.

2006-11-26 10:29:45 · answer #7 · answered by Frog Five 5 · 1 1

Bill Gates doles out millions to charities. Is he also the one you're talking about?
Hollywood is lower than whale poop, and that's at the bottom of the ocean!

2006-11-26 09:00:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

These Hollywood people would be helping the poor if they got time from getting married.

2006-11-26 09:01:45 · answer #9 · answered by zabist 4 · 1 2

we can never judge people. we only can see the outside of mother teresa and also all hollywood stars

2006-11-26 09:02:01 · answer #10 · answered by jamesyei 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers