America could say "Liberty is our right" but what I feel is the word Liberty should have proper definition is it right?
let me brief it, "humen can have any thought or imagination about themself or about other or about their way of living but it doesnt mean by using your liberty you can express all of them" thats why people express their "Gay" feelings "lesbian" feelings and I was surprised to hear some thing called DL (Down Low - the one has sex with normal life partner and with the same sex as well) I watched it on "Opra's" show, one man with the presence of his wife and daughters expressing his lust on other man which he was suppressing.
and other type of vulgarities too are being expressed......... when it comes to the public there are people with the same feelings, thoughts and imaginations comes out supporting them and asking for the right to practice it. any one agree this..?
if it is restricted to announce and punished to practice How enjoyable is this "Liberty" is?
2006-11-25 20:04:01 · 4 answers · asked by winny_victo-2008 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Liberty is freedom of thought not freedom of action.
You are free to think whatever you like.
Liberty goes along with Free Speech, but are different.
No, I don't agree with you.
2006-11-27 02:42:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, WOW.
The DL is when you're sneaking around on your partner. Gay or straight. It's not a sexual position, nor does it mean same sex cheating. "Keep it on the down low" is like saying to your friends, "yeah, I'm seeing this great chick, but don't tell my girlfriend" - it's like saying "keep it a secret". Better yet, you could call it a term for cheating. You wanna keep it on the DL so no one finds out. Think you misunderstood that one. Secondly, what has this to do with R&S? Liberty rocks. Pay more attention to Sista Oprah next time, then go online and look up some slang so you use it properly from now on.
2006-11-26 04:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Liberty means unfettered expression. However, there might be circumstances when it would be better restrained.
But that is not pure liberty. If you value liberty, you have to accept unwanted speech on others' behalf; you can only control your own body. This is humbling though: you have to rely upon the power of example to transform others. It's a long path, for people change slowly, but can be an inspiring one.
If people do what they want to do, and choose to do good, how much more inspiring that is than to have their hand forced?
As for the rest, I avoid the likes of Oprah's shows; I may not agree with you as to what is distasteful: what offends me most are shows of meanness, so I simply choose not to watch them.
2006-11-26 04:15:28 · answer #3 · answered by Morosoph 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well for starters...part of "liberty" is that you have the right to keep your nose out of what consenting adults do in their bedrooms if it bothers you...At the same time, "liberty" should not infringe on other peoples' basic rights...for instance you don't have the liberty to discriminate against people who choose to live a homosexual lifestyle.
2006-11-26 04:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by nuthnbettr2do0128 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋