Do you believe in a Government Cover Up of 9/11?

Question

A) It was an Inside Job.. US GOVT Masterminded the operation
B) US GOVT Partipated In the 9-11 attacks, But didnt mastermind em
C) There is a cover up of 9-11
D) They have told the us complete truth, No cover up.

Answer 1

Those are the only four options?

How about E) they were warned but paid no attention to the cautions and have been covering up their stupidity ever since.
They didn't have to conduct the attacks to find themselves having to lie about them.

Answer 2

It could be a cover up and I have heard a lot of people saying it is a conspiracy to brainwash everyone. Perhaps but whether or not it is true, it is a FACT that Bush used it as an excuse to try and get his hands on Iraqi oil. Choosing Islamic terrorists sure was convenient. And now everyone has come to know the truth that this war is totally a lie and a major screw up. Bush has messed up so badly that there is a civil war now. Do you think Rumsfeld resigning was just a coincedence? Obviously it was Bush' only escape hatch especially with it happening IMMEDIATELY following the elections where the Democrats won! He knows his a$$ is in deep trouble and the only way to remedy it is to pawn all the mistakes off on Rumsfeld and ditch the agenda -slowly but surely. Everyone can see each day the news is leading up to a time frame in bringing troops back or offering aid of more troops to assist before withdraw. He is in way over his head and now he has to bail the project because he isn't man enough to take on the muslim world especially if they all (Iran, Syria, and other muslim countries) unite. If he is so stupid that he refuses to back down then this definitely could be the beginnings of a WW3. Scary isn't it? But what is scariest is how we allowed this person to be elected and re-elected? He is the most radical leader we have had in our nations history.

And by the way, muslims live in every country in the world so they aren't exactly jealous and repressed about anything.

Answer 3

i choose C besides. i don't think that the "bombs contained in the homes" or "fly by twine plane" thoughts are authentic. The WTC were equipped in a special way than different homes. fairly some the burden of the shape became supported by the outer shell, so the substantial damage to it and element of the inner truss structure brought about trusses to break down. even as adequate trusses collapsed, the progression would have experienced a failure contained in the stress needed for the outer shell to face. It crumbled at purely one element, evidently, and then collapsed instantly down. They play on countless misconceptions. there is not any clarification why a tall progression gained't crumple into its footprint. pulling down a progression is compared to knocking over a lego. imagine about it - tonnes of metallic, all helping huge weight. A particle made a free projectile will fall instantly down - why shouldn't interlocked bits of metallic, none of that may help the burden above, do a similar? also, metallic does no longer might want to "melt" to sag - it is going to develop into structurally unsound at a techniques lower than its melting element. sure, i believe that's attainable there became a conspiracy because that's problematical to believe that airport screening AND the protection rigidity would both thoroughly fail on quicker or later.

Answer 4

if it gives your life meaning to come up with crap like that, then why not A?

but look at the evidence. don't be silly. D. the truth is that pissed off muslims had been saying they would attack us for years. there were even small scale attacks before 9/11. noone paid attention though. and finally, the big one came. the rest is history.

Answer 5

I think it was an inside job. Bush and his friends are in the oil business. What better "excuse" to go after oil in countries where supposed enemies are and make up so many lies to do so? Why ignore what is going on with Darfur and Africa if they are so concerned about the people? No extremists in Africa that would have the strength to fight back, so why not go there and help the people out in the name of liberation if they cared so much? Also, how do you explain those towers falling straight down, and not to the sides? With each floor collapsing on its own (planned implosion), if that had happened on its own, the buildings would have gone to the sides and not straight down so as to protect wall street.

Answer 6

As much as I agree with your screen name, you're out of your mind. The government's explanation of 9/11 is infinitely more believable than anything in that Loose Change garbage. I mean, come on. A controlled demolition? Flight 93 landing in Cleveland? The cell phone calls pre-taped with computer-manufactured voices that sounded like the passengers? A missile hitting the Pentagon? Do you actually believe all of that nonsense?

Answer 7

E) None of the above. There are people who were there who know a lot of the truth, but knowing any COMPLETE truth depends both on someone's ability to tell and on your ability to understand. But you didn't want to hear that. You want to steer people toward a conspiracy theory answer by pretending to give a multiple choice where the one non-conspiracy answer is ludicrous.
I went easy on you. I could have said "all of the above" and really messed with you.

Answer 8

My answer is D, they told the complete truth. A bunch of Radical Muslims that are jealous because we have freedom and they don't, decided too high-jack planes and ram them into buildings. The US goverment had nothing too do with 9-11

Answer 9

E) No participation, but a lot of covering up by numerous people trying to protect their own tailfeathers.

Answer 10

Do you really think George W. Bush is ANY kind of mastermind? Americans must have low standards for such things.