English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Only if their holding the chainsaw!

2006-11-25 17:56:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No. It does not make a 'sound' or 'noise'. those issues are psychological activities and would basically happen if a suggestions is modern. The tree that falls will make the vibrations interior the air, yet those vibrations are actually not sound. Nor are they sound whilst they attain the organs of your ear. what's transmitted from the ear by neural pathways to the suggestions isn't sound the two. And the suggestions interest that occurs whilst the indicators get there nonetheless isn't a valid. that is all vibrations and impulses until eventually it rather is perceived by making use of the suggestions. At no think approximately this technique different than its end are you able to discover the 'sound' of a tree crashing to the woodland floor. you will basically discover needed yet not sufficient factors of sound if there is not any suggestions to receive it.

2016-12-17 16:20:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If a tree falls down in a forest and there's somebody there.
Does that make it their fault?

no.

2006-11-25 18:04:23 · answer #3 · answered by cork 7 · 0 0

is it that somebody's fault that the tree fell down? It depends. If he was the one who cut it down or was just hiking or something.

2006-11-25 17:56:11 · answer #4 · answered by joruaishiteru 2 · 1 0

If you ask this question of a Democrat they will first ask you if the person in the forest was a republican. If they were republican then it was their fault 100%. If the person in the forest was a democrat then it was the republican congress's fault for not stopping global warming.

2006-11-25 18:05:36 · answer #5 · answered by BlkJac 3 · 0 1

I would say so, yes. BUT did they hear it fall, or had they gotten so far from the tree that they couldn't hear it, OR were they deaf?

2006-11-25 18:32:03 · answer #6 · answered by Phlodgeybodge 5 · 0 0

No it was the tree's, should not have been standing in the way anyway.

2006-11-25 22:35:18 · answer #7 · answered by Birdie2006 5 · 0 0

Did they cut it down. Then yes. If not then they probably still killed the tree somehow indirectly.

2006-11-25 17:55:39 · answer #8 · answered by mike L 2 · 0 1

Why don't you learn how to spell and quit worrying about a damn "hypothetical" tree.

2006-11-25 18:02:31 · answer #9 · answered by Richard H 2 · 1 0

well if theyve got hold of a chainsaw and have a guilty look about them you could be right

2006-11-25 19:08:30 · answer #10 · answered by nendlin 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers