No, it's stupid. If you're considering marriage after 2 weeks, you're being unrealistic. Date for 8-10 months first, not weeks.
2006-11-25 16:06:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I would start off by asking how old you are and how old your boyfriend is? It seems the older you get, the less time it takes to get engaged if you know what you want and just go for it. Word to the wise though, if you are younger, I would wait. Not to say you don't know your feelings but if you love him and he loves you, that won't fade in a few months, a year. Have fun being a new couple, date, go out. Marriage can be a beautiful thing but it's not something you should rush, take your time and good luck!
2006-11-25 16:10:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rhode Island Red 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
You're still in that head-over-heels stage of a new relationship. The problems will start to arise in another couple of months and it's how you deal with those problems that determines whether you'll make it together in the long run. An engagement just messes all that up. You're rushing into something that should be held off for a little while longer.
2006-11-25 16:03:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Imperfect 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi. pay attention up..... you obtain in contact with a guy who has..... (one million) lied to you from the commencing up. After 3 MONTHS he tells you he's engaged.....and (2) is a entire cheat. What makes you think of despite if he cancels his wedding ceremony and you 2 are an merchandise and at last get engaged....that he won't do the precise comparable factor to YOU? A cheater is often a cheater.....they don't hastily substitute. Run away....toss the toothbrush and garments and don't see or consult from him back. superb to have your coronary heart broken now extremely than once you're approximately to stroll down the aisle. i think so undesirable for his "spouse to be" understanding what's in save for her.
2016-12-29 12:11:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Call me sentimental, but I believe in love at first site. But then again being engaged doesn't mean you have to get married right away! I think it's a commitment to be with each other and that's good! I got engaged to my wife after three months together and we've been happily married three years now! I also have a cousin who has been engaged for thirteen years now and she still hasn't set a date! So yeah!
2006-11-25 16:22:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by pete 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to say no. Not a good idea. Relationships or marriages are hard enough when you have known them for a long time. These feelings are called lust. Lust with potential. Great while it lasts. After that, it's work and commitment that get you through. Give it a year, minimum, if you still feel the same way about him, then maybe give it a shot. Good luck.
2006-11-25 16:07:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ssnbrphy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they both have super deep feelings for each other, then what is the rush? They should take the time to make sure the relationship can last and if they still feel the same, then they can get engaged.
There is nothing to lose with waiting and lots to lose for rushing in.
Hope that helps!
2006-11-25 16:04:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anne 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should wait a little longer because in the first stages of a relationship you always have that excitement and deep feelings for each other. But its after you get to know the person better and experience their "flaws", you will know if you can spend the rest of your life with the person.
2006-11-25 16:05:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by skykiss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get engaged .. !! can i suppose -married ! Is n't that dating and engaging put together ? Absolutely ok, as long as super-deep feelings could be fetched out of the relationship.
2006-11-25 16:18:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by akshay s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats not the best thing to do.
A high school friend of mine got engaged after a month!!! They're getting married in March '07.
2006-11-25 16:05:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥Brown Eyed Girl ♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋