Would you openly target people from another religion to ridicule the whole religion?

Question

If so which? and why?

Why the whole religion?

Answer 1

No.

Answer 2

Actually, I would not target specifically certain people and then base my decision on the whole religion. I prefer to look at the religion as a whole and see the "fruits" it produces. Individually, people are imperfect and are going to make mistakes. So, no, I wouldn't ridicule the whole thing based on the mistakes of a few individuals.

Answer 3

No.

You're itching for a fight on Muhammad and the 9 year old girl and you know what, 90% of everyone who is NOT a Muslim is going to go up against this one. This doesn't ridicule the religion, however, just the Prophet or the Tradition, however a GOOD prophet should KNOW where to draw the line.

Islamics have told me OVER and OVER that it's a TRIBAL thing and I tend to believe them when they say that.

It doesn't make me like it or approve of it.

I've known that in Mexico older men negociate for marraiges with a girl when shes six or seven and then marry her at the LEGALLY ALLOWED AGE of 14 in Mexico with Parental Consent.

I have LESS problems with that, but I STILL have problems with that!

I think a Girl should decided, freely, with NO RELIGION or TRADITION or PARENTS or FAMILY in the way and I think she should be at an age we'd let her drive cars, fly planes, vote in elections, work for a living and move out on her own.

And my views on this apply uniformly on all religions, including my own.

Answer 4

no,it is never right. and i can see by ur avatar that u r muslim. and u probably get harrased the most. people shouldnt generalize that if one person is bad out of the whole religion that they all are. if u look at these questions it happens to every religion.it is not right to do that at all,and if there christian they should do what the bible says to do and be kind to ur neighbors. and there are some athiests who claim to be the kindest people they shouldnt critisize other people. but those are just some people,not the whole religion. good luck with the answers.dont be discouraged though if people get mad at ur question and give mean answers. good luck,though.

Answer 5

I don't ridicule other religions, I only have a problem with preachyness. Everyone has the right to choose to be in a religion or not to.

BB
)O(

Answer 6

No, no need in it. Why use personel attacks. Example, I could say that Mohammad was not a prophet because he killed the mother and father of a 9 years old girl in front of her eyes then took her to his bed that very night. Which by the way it true. But what purpose did it serve in saying that. But if you combine that with the fact that he died of a sexually transmitted desease and no prophet ever died of a flesh desease. Or the fact that his father died three years before he was born and he was born in sin and is the product of sin. Thus i am not attaching the person i am stating the facts. So is it a personnel attach on the person of Mohammad. No it is a statement of the facts speaking for themselfs that this man was not a prophet but a murder, a pedifile and was not a prophet because he bore the sin of his life in his flesh. His charactor speaks for itself. And he is said to be the messanger of God. Let us get this right this man is a messanger of satan at best. And has nothing to due with God at all. Every prophet of God could read and write they spent time in the scriptures of God for years. So there is not a attach of the person but of the charactor which are shown by the facts. More over why attach a person of a faith when it is easy to disprove the faith itself. Example in the Torah God tells men not to sleep with 4 legged animals but in the quran in one sara we are instructed that it is ok to sleep with 4 legged animals. So as God is not divided. The God of the prophets of the Torah is not the allah of the Muslims. The allah of the muslims us unholy. The God of the prophets demands holyness. The quarn in another sara tells us that it is ok to sleep with the wife of a married man. In other words it endorces adultry. In the law given to mosus this is a sin before God. Once again the Quran instructs you to live in sin. This is thur out the quran. So why attach a person when you can quote there own text and point out the difference.

Answer 7

nicely, i'm not a Christian, yet i could be happy to point out the failings on your question. enable's start up with: "I assure that Christ, a Hebrew, neither taught nor believed in creation as maximum present day Christians do." No you could not, till you have someway discovered an authenticated letter written via Jesus detailing precisely what he believed. if so, carry it. Or how approximately: "i can coach, in the 1st sentence of the Bible, that the "Hebrew God of creation" isn't the "Christian God of creation" All you have "shown" is that Christians and Hebrews have particularly distinctive view on what "God" did. You did not coach they have been distinctive gods. An optimist could look at a tumbler and say it particularly is 0.5 finished, mutually as a pessimist could say it particularly is 0.5 empty. distinctive view, besides the undeniable fact that it particularly is an analogous glass (nicely, perchance not, yet it extremely is a distinctive arguement). and then back: "in the 1st verse of the Bible I discredit the Christian view of the God of creation" No, you probably did not. You confirmed that Christian text fabric and Hebrew text fabric variety. That does not something to discredit the Christian view. heavily, for somebody who demands a logical answer, you're making a great variety of leaps of "good judgment." It makes you sound like somebody who's extra interested in bringing down Christianity than actually looking fact. Do us all a choose and think of issues by way of in basic terms a sprint extra next time

Answer 8

Sometimes. It's the damned Christians that bother me, because they're trying to make their beliefs the law that we all must follow in my country, and I'm really sick of it. I'm sick of their hatred and their hypocrisy. The American military has destroyed Iraq and killed as yet untold thousands of civilians there (add that to a long list of other countries either directly or indirectly destroyed by religious zealots over time) due to the Christian fright-wing nutcases having one of their guys in the President's office and Congress packed with them, and yet every day they're here bashing Muslims. And anyone who tries to tell you that the Christian right isn't responsible for that mess, is an idiot or a liar, or both. Thank goodness there's a bit of hope now, since the last elections.


Christians: Can you say 'hypocrisy'? Can you say 'thou shalt not kill'?

Answer 9

Never, as a muslim i have to respect others religion but maybe when someone from other religion is insulting my religion i may say bad things about his religion...This could be wrong but i can't watch other insulting Islam and stand right there smiling

Answer 10

I think what I would ask first is, are these people a true representation of what the religion teaches? If I saw a hateful Christian, yet I knew that Christ taught His disciples to love one another, and even to love their enemies, then I do not think it would be honest and fair to judge Christianity by the example of one bad disciple.

Answer 11

I wouldn't but religious extremists would. Muslim Extremists say that all those who do not share their beliefs are "Infidels" and must be killed. There are Christian Extremists who say that the only way to heaven (they own it) is through Jesus Christ and a Jew, Muslim , Hindu , etc. will not gain entrance into heaven..The fierce competition between religions is turning off a lot of people.