Yeah, Oswald did it. There's never been any evidence to prove any other theory. I think people deny it because they don't want to believe that a powerful leader like JFK could have possibly been taken down by a little punk like Oswald. You WANT to believe that it had to have been a giant conspiracy with the Mafia involved, the Soviets involved, Castro involved. It seems to justify his death more. But no, it was a lone gunman. There's no logical reason to believe anything else.
2006-11-25 12:34:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by . 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think Oswald was definitely involved and did fire some of the shots. But if you watch the film of the actual shooting, I can't help but think there was a shot fired from another direction. In the specials I have seen on it, they claim Oswald fired that shot that struck him in the head. Well... it just don't figure. I have shot many deer in the head from various angles, including from behind, with a 7mm, and one thing is constant. The side of the head opposite from where the shot was fired, always has a large exit wound. Kennedy had no large exit wound in front anywhere. One of the specials had a report from a mortician who said he was called in to "repair" a large wound on the back of Kennedy's head, consistent with a head shot fired from in front, not behind. But I doubt there will ever be any conclusive proof one way or the other.
2006-11-25 12:49:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by tmarschall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I watched the special on the discovery channel and it did look possible, still I do not believe that he acted alone. I herard the man on the radio shortly after he was apprehended and it seemed clear to me and many at that point that he could not have been the one. This radio broadcast has never been played since and I think it may have been destroyed. Anytime something like this happens watch the news closely immediately because the truth gets through, and then disappears. Same same with his sons plane "explosion"
2006-11-25 12:38:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by icheeknows 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
V & laptop video games could lead directly to an undesirable habit which isolates you socially yet a minimum of you could focus for hours on end. there is the choose for parental monitoring, yeah good, who has the time to try this 24/7. television and laptop video games are the glorified nanny's who shop toddlers intrigued for hours, variations personalities with a flick of a button, impacts attitudes regardless of if unfavourable or beneficial, on call 24/7 at your disposal, by no ability judgmental or extreme yet makes you experience you're on top of issues in any respect circumstances, fake hopes? What extra do you go with. television and laptop video games have there place because of the fact getting to understand comes from what you visually see and appearing upon it, yet whilst it can not be differentiated between certainty and myth then we are in hassle. some have cleverly made a profession out of so referred to as unfavourable ideals yet do I dare say that watching extreme quantities of television and enjoying laptop video games will make
2016-10-17 13:21:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ashworth 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Total fabbrication so as to hide the ascention of LBJ to the presidency, anbd therefore, another goerge.,w bush war mentality. Kennedy was trying to end viet nam, and military and business siad that would not do at all.
Conspiracy!
2006-11-25 12:34:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Legandivori 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some would say it's fully solved, some would say it's not. What happened that day is still being debated. What this have to do with religion and or spirituality is another mystery in itself.
2006-11-25 12:34:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i doubt he killed jfk..he's just a scrape goat, maybe n ord. chap or someone who did know d assassin.
2006-11-25 12:32:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hermione J.Potter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He really did it
2006-11-25 12:34:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by October 7
·
0⤊
0⤋