If someone is found guilty of molesting their children 15-20 years ago but has been found to not do it anymore would you trust your child around them?
*My ex feels it's alright, as well as a lawyer and a judge. I kept my ex from taking my son (I did not stop visits) because he had moved back in with his mother who had molested him as a child. The judge found me in contempt of court because I should have know my ex's mother doesn't molest kids anymore.
2006-11-25
11:33:26
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Pregnancy & Parenting
➔ Parenting
Believe me, if I had a choice I wouldn't be letting him take him. At this point though, if I don't the judge pretty much made it clear he could and would make things worse for me.
2006-11-25
11:40:53 ·
update #1
There were so many excellent responses that I just couldn't chose so I am putting it to a vote. Thank you all for your opinions.
2006-11-26
05:04:52 ·
update #2
I work for Child Protective Services and have been a sex offender counselor for over 8 years now. To the best of my knowledge, I have NEVER known an offender to just quit offending. It takes a lot of treatment and counseling. You have the right to have supervised visits for your child, if your ex is living in her house. He could be charged with failure to protect if he leaves the child with his mother alone. If your state is not willing to do something for you in this matter, to protect your child you might seriously consider moving. Please, at the very least get an order for child protection against his mother. Once a molester, always a molester. Sorry dear. Protect your child at all costs. Your ex may be willing to turn a blind eye, don't you. Best wishes. Nana
2006-11-25 11:39:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by nanawnuts 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Someone who sexually molests children does not stop. That has been proven time and time again. If they could stop they would not be required to register where they live.
I would never allow such a person alone with my children. The lawyer and judge are totally wrong.
Here's an idea. Contact the Oprah Winfrey Show. She is adamantly against people who sexual molest others. I'll bet they can give you some advice.
You are a very courageous mother and I stand squarely behind you. Continue to protect your child mom!
2006-11-25 11:41:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter if a person molested a child a 100 years ago and still has not done it again,they should not be allowed to be around children! If a person had the temptation to molest a child before who is to say that they won't have that temptation again! You should fight this,go over the judge's head,go to the DA or whoever you have to,get a lawyer. DON'T LET YOURE CHILD GO AROUND HER! good luck.
2006-11-25 11:43:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your main job is to protect your children. Find an good lawyer, do anything to keep them away from this person. A child molester never ever deserves the benefit of doubt.
2006-11-25 11:39:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by MeanKitty 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I respectfully disagree with the judge and would not allow anything other than supervised visits with the child's grandmother. While sex offenders can change, it is rare that they do. I would hire a lawyer to defend myself in this instance and obtain a guardian ad lietem for my child if necessary to protect the child. My child was abused by a cousin and we have NEVER allowed that child or any other child near him since. You will never have the problem if you do not expose the child to the risk. I believe they should know their grandmother, BUT only in a carefully supervised (by me or their mother) supervision.
2006-11-25 12:17:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by snddupree 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i comprehend i go adverse to the Dragon in this one, and that places me at an instantaneous shy away, yet i absolutely really like Michael Cole. i imagine that a lot of human beings promptly dislike him because he replaced Jim Ross on raw. I thoroughly agree that that replaced right into a negative selection through Vince, yet that's why human beings want to undergo in concepts. That it replaced into Vince's selection, no longer JR's and under no circumstances Michael Cole's. i do not imagine that Cole and The King have tremendous chemistry jointly, yet at the same time as he replaced into teamed with JBL or Tazz he replaced into astounding. lots of the proper statement that i have ever heard got here from Michael Cole at the same time as side cashed in money interior the monetary employer again in 2007 adverse to the Undertaker. undergo in concepts, properly after Undertaker tied with Batista in that metallic cage adventure? Cole did such an outstanding activity of putting emotion into the adventure that it made it a classic second and really set side up even extra then he already replaced into as a important heel. The statement is a huge area of any WWE adventure. tremendous statement can turn a lengthy and uninteresting adventure right into a classic. i really imagine that Cole has which skill. as a lot as I loved Christian's go back, i did not imagine that the statement replaced into good. that's to undesirable, because usually Todd Grischam is magnificent and that i love him, yet when Jim Ross or Michael Cole were saying that, it ought to have made the instantaneous a lot cooler. do not get me incorrect, i could not provide up smiling both way, notwithstanding the statement really did make a distinction in a unfavorable way. i imagine that interior the destiny, Striker and Grisham want to be chop up up. For the most area Grischam is sweet, yet Striker is basically soooo severe. He receives stressful.
2016-10-16 10:30:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OH MY GOSH!!!!!!!!!!! what an idiot judge and attorney!!!! I don't trust anybody!!!!! even nice people!!!! I'm like a hawk keeping an eye on my kids!!! and for a mother to molest her son!!! She should be burned alive!!!! Who could a child trust if he canot even trust his own mother, what she did is what horror, terror and satanic movies are made of. Do not trust her!!!!!!! I would rather run away to another country than leave my kids with that demonic woman!
2006-11-25 16:57:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by RO 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hell no because if he molested a child once he will do it again no matter how much he says he has changed don't believe him!And if your really concerned about your childs safety then why are you even thinking of letting that man near your child!Personally I wouldn't well thats all I have to say!
2006-11-25 11:38:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Baby Gurl 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I totally agree with you. People relapse all the time and why should a child suffer? You can't put your trust in man. I'm sooooo sorry you even had to make that decision. Your ex should understand how he felt as a child. I'm really sorry.
2006-11-25 11:39:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kennedy & Kevin's mommy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Once a pedophile, always a pedophile PERIOD.
Did you have a lawyer? Because really that doen't sound like the right decision. Especially if you are allowing your ex to visit the children at other locations.
2006-11-25 11:38:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋