Have you ever considered that violence is not the answer to everything that upsets you?
"Violence is the last resort of the incompetent"
Isaac Asminov
2006-11-25 10:08:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Where did you get your 'facts'? You are very off base on this. A drug buy was made earlier in the day at that very house. The police had a search warrant. She would not have been the first drug dealing gramma in history.
Cop shooting have been something of an epidemic in metro Atlanta this year. Hey all you thugs put your guns, machetes, whatever down or better yet just don't commit the crime. I am on the cops side until they, the cops,are proven guilty.
2006-11-25 10:20:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by smartgrrlz 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Don't like the facts I guess.
Officers had bought drugs earlier that day in that house, Drugs were found in the house,
this dangious 92 year old women opened fire on the officers first.
The officers will most likely get medals,
You should be proud of the officers doing a dangerous job and risking their lifes.
2006-11-25 12:02:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yep, just that morning detectives purchased narcotics from a male subject at the home. This is how the warrant was validated. The woman is just as guilty as the one dealing the actual drugs. It's ashame the way it went down, but she had as much responsibility for the events leading to her death than the swat team.
2006-11-25 11:26:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by spag 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
This woman had drugs being dealt out of her home. Maybe she was probably being victimized by a drug dealer who found it convenient to deal out of her home. Won't hear any squawking about that because we like to throw the cops under the wheels of the blame bus and for good measure, play the race card.
She unloaded 5 or 6 shots and 3 of them found their mark. Tells me she's used a gun before. You are not going to get a lot of sympathy from me just yet. There is more to this than meets the eye.
2006-11-25 10:01:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by digitsis 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
Uumm, it wasn't the wrong address. They had undercover officers go into a known drug house, got a warrant from a judge, and went in clearly wearing police uniforms and identifying themselves. The woman shot at them they defended themselves. I don't care who you are if you're running a drug house and shooting at the cops what ever happens to you is your own fault. Try looking at the facts before you start making up your own.
2006-11-25 09:59:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dark 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
with the help of liberating the images extra hatred and mistrust must be inserted into an already violent international. this can absolutely further injure the U.S. it truly is component to the plan for the death of a loose u . s . and could be performed to deflate the yank ego and spoil the have self belief something else of the international had for us. We, the people, are at warfare with the unlawful authorities!
2016-11-26 21:59:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but I hope the police officers involved in the shooting get medals for doing there job. Sorry ,but no murder was committed.
2006-11-25 12:16:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by spyderman131 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is a terrible thing. There may be riots, if she was black.
The ATF has killed 4 or 5 people over the years, mostly women, because they were at the wrong house.
These agents broke in with ski masks over their heads.
The dead women were white, so there were no riots.
A shame.
Whoa!!!!! Is your question accurate?????
Was it the wrong house????
2006-11-25 10:01:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
If the riots have not started, they are over-due & late...
Too bad more people don't start shooting when these
thugs start breaking down doors...
2006-11-25 10:02:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋