English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As democtrats or republicans they normally vote based on the layalty to their gang rather than based on the facts.

And shouldn't the presidant be an independant at all times?

Also, people you are not supose to be voting as D or R. You are not D or R. You are supose to be humans voting D or R depending and based on the issues and facts. This way you won't vote base on what gang or group you pertain to.

2006-11-25 08:22:52 · 6 answers · asked by kasar777 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

Your right, I am getting so sick of both the Republicans and the Democrats. All they seem worried about is throwing mud at each other like a bunch of dirty chimps.

2006-11-25 08:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by LONGINUS 2 · 0 0

Listen, we tried having independents in the past. It doesn't work. It eventually came into what we have now. A two-party system.

You don't make any sense. Having a GROUP of Independents is not possible here.

2006-11-25 16:29:24 · answer #2 · answered by burnsk8er2000 3 · 0 0

Unfortunately, we still have a 2 part system. Anyone who takes votes away from this at this point in time will elect another Bush.

2006-11-25 16:25:23 · answer #3 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0 1

It actually started out that way. Unfortunately, the party system started and will likely never go away.

2006-11-25 16:34:30 · answer #4 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 0 0

what is fireball 226 talking about. I agree with you, but I have a feeling it will never happen.

2006-11-25 16:48:11 · answer #5 · answered by haiku_katie 4 · 0 0

No by Jesus Christ
also you dont get to tell ppl how to cast their votes
i dont vote but for those who do its personal...

2006-11-25 16:29:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers