Can the non-existence of God be proven?

Answer 1

Yes.

For knowledge to exist, three facts must be accepted as true:

- Math & Logic are valid
- Direct observations or aided observations supported by Math & Logic are valid
- Supernatural existence, if real, does not involve itself in the natural realm (otherwise, any 'fact' could be changed by the interference -- say by the God of Gravity changing his mind on how strong it will be tomorrow).

Free will can thus be shown to be false:

- The mind is a consequence of the physical nature of the brain (Nonsupernatural causation axiom).
- Quantum physics contains a truly random component (Mathematical axiom)
- All observations can be expressed mathematically (Mathematical axiom).
- All principles causal to observations can be expressed mathematically (Mathematical Axiom).
- All mathematical expressions can be evaluated (Mathematical Axiom).
- An evaluation need not be deterministic, it can be stochaistic, that is, describing 'probabilities'. (Statistical mathematics).
- Since quantum physics can affect the human brain, and thus mind, the human state is mathematically stochaistic (consequential)
- If the quantum randomness is rescoped to be viewed as an input, the human brain ceases to be stoichasitic and is deterministic. (statement of rescope)
- A deterministically computable system is incapable of escaping its previous states, and produces outputs based on a computable result of the previous state and current inputs.(Turing-Church Thesis)
- Determinism counters free will. (By definition)
- Free will is not possible. (consequential)
- If a deity exists, free will is a natural consequence. (axiomic, potentially debatable. However, a deity that creates intelligence without free will cannot hold its creation responsible)
- Free will does not exist, therefore, deity does not exist. (modus tollens).

The idea of a god existing is disproven logically.

Answer 2

The existence of god is proved beyond doubt. Non-belief in god only deprives one of the grace of god.

If you are a theist... you already believe in the Existence of God! If you are an atheist... you look forward to clues which would scientifically or otherwise prove the Existence of God.

Both the theories are correct. It is only saying that the glass is half full and the other half empty! Belief in the Existence of God stems from extreme faith in the system of God the Almighty Creator. Being on the highest level of manifestation... human beings understand that nothing gets created on its own.


If we believe in the fact that the whole cosmos is the creation of God then we believe in the surmise that "God Does Exist". On the contrary atheists desire a proof of Existence of God. As per Jainism beliefs there is no Existence of God and they do not believe in the existence of a Creator. According to Jainism the Cosmos exists from times immemorial.

Believing in the Existence of God is like believing in the existence of a flower. Even though a flower may not be directly visible to us but we can feel its presence by the fragrance it emits... God also exists but we cannot see it due to the limitations of the senses. God the Almighty is beyond the capture of the senses and the mind. Read more here- http://www.godrealized.org/existence_of_god.html

Answer 3

Under ordinary circumstances, one can't prove the non-existence of something, however some argue that God's omnipotent nature is inherently contradictory, and He couldn't possibly exist in much the same way that an invisible pink unicorn couldn't.

By our logic, at least - if the unicorn is invisible, it couldn't be pink, since the two states are at odds with each other. Similarly, some would argue a being couldn't be omnipotent, because in order to do everything, he would have to do things that effectively limit his omnipotence. For instance, if he couldn't create a rock that he couldn't lift, then he wouldn't be omnipotent. (However, if HE could create a rock he couldn't lift, that would also make him not omnipotent.)

Some argue that a truly omnipotent deity isn't limited to our logical system, and could effectively do things that seem downright contradictory to us. (It really depends on whether logic is universal, or regional. Are there areas of space that are governed by different rules of logic, and how could we possibly fathom this if it were true?)

Answer 4

If God did exist, he's the tyrannical psychotic form of deity who might make particular we knew it. That shows he would not exist. quite a few savants have mentioned that the Bible examine heavily and objectively is extremely stable evidence that its deity can not exist. A god who created the universe could desire to no longer be as ignorant approximately it because of the fact the illiterate Hebrew or Egyptian shepherd who began the Bible.

Answer 5

The existence of God can be neither proven nor disproven. If it could, then God would be a subject of science and not religion.

Answer 6

For all you non-believers out there who want to talk about how there is no god let me tell you something that defies logic to science. There is a better chance that a tornado can rip through a junk yard and create a 5-16 fighter jet than the world and it's creations created by random chance of no design.

Answer 7

Yes. You can show life is impossible without a creator.

Do you know statistics? You can create a hypothesis, and test it.

A simple hypothesis is to test the most favorable component of of the random component (not actual, but most favorable, make it as favorable as you like) of origins of life or random mutations at a 99.99999+++% confidence interval. It fails everytime and thus, the null hypothesis is true. God exists. Is this a proof? No, it is just the most likely outcome.

Answer 8

No, but neither can the existence of God. Its a circular rat race that nobody will win.

Answer 9

Nope...just like the non-existence of Harry Potter cannot be proven. Does that mean that Harry Potter is real...

Answer 10

No, the nonexsistance of god cant be proven. But neither can the exsistance of god be proven.