It depends on the situation. Can you have a debate with this person without it getting out of control? If not, it may be best to say "I see.." and move on unless it is a work related topic. Then you have to decide if "you would rather be right or happy". Kind of like being in a marriage.
I love to have debates with people unless they get emtional. I can debate all day long and have fun doing it. The problem is that most people become emotional about the things they are discussing. Once someone raises thier voice, it's no longer any fun.
2006-11-25 05:09:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gypsy Girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That depends entirely on whether or not the opinion is relevent to your job.
And then it depends on whether your opinion is relevent to something that you can actually have an effect on, or is a question of ethics.
For example, when I worked fast-food, we were required to take food and refrigerator temps four times a day. Most people faked them when we were busy; my boss told me it was okay. I told her I'd rather do it properly as it could potentially relate to the health of our customers.
Counter-example -- if your company has been sold to a larger corperation and you think their new marketing direction is a poor choice -- and you're not in marketing -- keep quiet.
However, if the different opinions are not work-related, tread very carefully. The traditional subjects not to be broached in polite company are religion, politics, sex and money. Have these debates online, in coffee shops, at the gym -- anywhere but work. You have to live with these people every day and there's enough tension inherent in the workplace day to day without creating more. If someone that you work with is spouting off political opinions you don't agree with, hold your peace in that environment. Don't get drawn into arguements or debates at work; people can rarely keep their emotions out of them. You'll come off looking discrete and diplomatic (this is good).
2006-11-25 05:03:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by dancinghawk_wolf 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have a good relation with my Boss, If I do not like what he said I talk to him in Private and vice verse.
Some companys are to big that you never meet the owner of the place, but I always recomend good relation with your superior.
But beware never ever made a comentarie about your boss manager or someone in height charge because theres always envious people that LIE to keep you in trouble so ignore this people coment but you can go direct to your superioir and tell him or her, your personal opinion.
Sometime my husband said, is good that you can tell to your boss what you like and what you dont like, is good becuae I work great at my job.
2006-11-25 05:32:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by FallenAngel 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's best to be diplomatic at work and not voice your opinions on a lot of controversial issues. That old adage that one should never talk about politics, sex or religion in public is still a pretty valid rule of thumb.
2006-11-25 06:07:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by cheyennetomahawk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you have many workers you can be intimidated. But you have the right to voice your opinion, and just maybe some others will like your opinion better. As long as you don't keep saying my way is better. majority rules
2006-11-25 05:47:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by lennie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well it depends, but you should always keep in mind that if a man thinks himself that he knows everything, then keep your opinion for yourself. But if the person you are talking to is open minded so don't hesitate in expressing your feeling.
But whatever or whenever you feel within your heart that you should say it, so go for it with a big smile.
2006-11-25 05:06:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Antareport 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No right here can rightly and legitimately utter that he's to be deemed great in understanding and above wiser than his fellow human beings. The pretentiousness to understanding one would not very own is yet to be pitied quite than blamed and how could desire to you instructor make an exception? Is it that this guy or woman is so clever than she has grasped certainty totally and can tell aside what's sweet from what's misguided? No easily, it rather isn't any longer in conflict of words that a instructor could desire to locate flaws. inspite of the undeniable fact that, see that throughout the time of subjectivity, no longer a single answer is logically held, nor ought to anyone ever evaluate such an answer as being effectual in something, for it rather is the object of the study whose nature is the issue and concern of the enquiry which would be spoke of and examined; if so you declare till now all that it is the observer which concerns, tell me then how does his view will ever substitute the essence of what's examined? You, my chum, have been retaining many illusions as though they have been to be good in something, yet have not made an attempt to instruct and set up their legitimacy; in philosophy - and that's an argument of philosophy - you shall by no ability utter a line or evaluate something good except it consists of be so glaring on your strategies that it can not probably be refuted. purely because of the fact the others assumed that the guy became incorrect in no longer taking this place of dad, you have made many assumptions with reference to the linked fee of the girl's acts. if so this is her fault, in basic terms her fault, this is to be understood so which you could confirm that the different guy or woman became appearing rightly and virtuously purely because of the fact the girl became incorrect and merciless. i would not mark you down for answering in a diverse way; i might mark you down for failing to envision the mandatory logical hyperlinks and kin as an occasion the legitimacy and validity of your place. inspite of the undeniable fact that, you're oftentimes asked to jot right down to be exmined on your grammatical understanding which ability you hardly have sufficient word to envision this type of element. evaluate what's evaluated and what's possible to do with the given circumstances. a hundred% ability that one has completely met the mandatory skills and displayed it as much because it probably could have been in those given circumstances; it would not recommend desirable interior surely the.
2016-10-17 12:57:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We get paid to think (hopefully).
Listen much, speak carefully, but speak.
You do not need to agree with your boss as a job requirement and you are accountable for your actions. Good change comes from within the ranks....
I assume you are speaking about work related issues.
2006-11-25 04:58:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by pops 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Some people like to be right and will like to argue that their opinion is right and will find every way to convince and make it seem like you are wrong..... if this is the case then reply "I see" and move on because they are opinionated people that think that they know every damn thing!
2006-11-25 06:24:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by itsme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally I don't bother engaging in conversation with co-workers except for surface level. Anything deeper is just not worth my time. Opinions are like butts....everybody has one and they all stink.
2006-11-26 03:18:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋