he is already here,sitting in iran,waiting to wipe us of the face of the map.
2006-11-24 21:49:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by mikhal k 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'm going with GW Bush as well, if we have to play this silly Christ, Anti-Christ game.
Why? Because he has placed the world in the post perilous position it has been in for many a long year, why all the while claiming to be "doing Gods's work". That sounds awfully like anti-Christ behaviour. In fact - see Emma's post above for the biblical references relating to this.
But as I don't believe in Christ, the concept of an anti-Christ is not valid either, so therefore I can rest safe in the knowledge that GWB is simply a misguided human being.
2006-11-25 06:01:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gillian 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The term “antichrist(s)” is found but five times in the Bible and only in the writings of the apostle John. Identifying the antichrist of his day, John wrote: “Many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist.” And also further identifying the antichrist: “Who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist.”—2 John 7; 1 John 2:22, 18
Jesus foretold the coming of antichrist: “For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will give great signs and wonders so as to mislead, if possible, even the chosen ones.” And so did the apostle Paul. It appears that “antichrist” has a twofold meaning. As its name indicates, it is anti or opposed to Christ. And it also has the thought of false or pseudo Christ, in the place or stead of Christ. indicate that all persons, organizations or groups that falsely claim to represent Christ, that arrogate to themselves the Messianic role or that oppose Christ and his followers can properly be termed antichrists, even as Jesus said: “He that is not on my side is against me, and he that does not gather with me scatters.
It follows that all who deny this claim of Christ Jesus, be they devotees of Oriental religions, atheists, deists or agnostics, are antichrists. all who claim that Jesus was incarnated, merely clothed with flesh, are antichrists, for such deny that Jesus actually came in the flesh. Plainly we are told that “the Word became flesh,” and that he was “produced out of a woman.” Had he been merely incarnated he could have dispensed with a human mother. And had he been both human and divine upon the earth he would not have hungered after fasting, nor would he have needed rest after a journey or after a strenuous day; neither could he have died as man’s ransomer, for what is divine is immortal.—John 1:14; Gal. 4:4,
Since the days of the apostle John, men have claimed that John’s words about an antichrist designate one specific individual
1 John 2:18: “Just as you have heard that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to be many antichrists.” Yes, “many antichrists,” not one, were responsible for the spiritually troubled situation back in the first century. Today there are, not one, but many antichrists who form the antichrist class. Collectively, they have heaped spiritual ruin upon mankind. It is also political
2006-11-25 05:59:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Emma 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Anti-Christ will come from the Middle East region. Anyone who is an expert on Ancient History will know the countries former names and what they are called now. There are 4 of them.
2006-11-25 06:00:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
there are many anti Christ leaders look around from the USA to UK to China and rest i mean they all fit the category of anti Christ
2006-11-25 05:56:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
That bit in all of us that says "Screw everyone else, take care of number 1 at all cost."
That is literally the anti-Christ - the opposite of Christ.
~ Lib
2006-11-25 05:45:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by LibChristian 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
It makes little difference to me, if it was written then nothing I can do about it. Those that always talk of this and point to this country or leader and that one, only act as fools in thinking they know or can change God's will.
2006-11-25 05:53:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by AJ 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not born yet if there even is one. Why? Because we're nowhere near the level of evil in the world that the bible seems to imply is needed for the so called "rapture".
2006-11-25 05:46:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by odieman_3 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
He's probably going to be born in 5-20 years.
Thats what prophesies say.It might be someone really famous or just someone "normal".
What do you think?
2006-11-25 05:47:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Εlectra 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
To be honest we don't who it will be, but it will be somebody that will to try to convince the world that he is good and that he can do good, and alot of people will fall for it.
2006-11-25 05:58:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by tracy211968 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its a multi headed beast.
Dick Cheney
Jerry Falwell
Pat Roberts
Robert Tilman
Mark Foley
Barney the Dinosaur
2006-11-25 05:48:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋