Can you imagine the US stops interfering in other country's affairs?

Question

Already the world is burning. Terrorists have already taken over. What sort of world war someone imagines? Iraq is burning, Afghanistan is nowhere, Iran and North Korea are in line.

Someone says is a crime to interfere. Not at all. Will someone allow others to interefere? As a powerful nation with a lot of verve, US can certainly provide help or interfere when the country so requests for or the world community so thinks. Unilateral, ?????

Answer 1

Hi, Triumph. Every big brother has a tendency to poke his ugly nose into the affairs of the younger ones. US is no exception. Till the commencement of Second World War, the US was a non-interfering country and it was busy in the development of its own people. When it became a super power, it started to think that it has got a right to inerfere in the affairs of other countries as if it is the protector of the entire globe. This attitude of superiority complex has become the major hindrance for the international peace because some other countries also want to follow the same principle.

Answer 2

this is a good question. The U.S. needs to impose its way of thinking on different cultures yet this is the comparable as working the worldwide. The U.S. already has militia and intelligence domination over the planet. There ought to be some thank you to resign the insanity of conflict. possibly if the U.N. moved out of enormous apple to Geneva it would be no longer somewhat uncomplicated for the U.S. to dominate their judgements. If Latin united statesa. formed an financial union and stopped the exploitation of its components via the U.S. companies, it would help to resign American hegemony. The media ought to document particularly on each and every thing that is going on like in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. as a replace of reporting the certainty, American media places those instigators on television to effect the yank public. Thank Goodness for RT and al Jazeera.

Answer 3

If the US stops interfering in other country's affairs.. does this also mean we should take back the $500 million we have dished out to impoverished countries last year? I really wish the US would pull all of its soldiers back. Drill our own oil. Not import or export anything for the next ten years and watch the rest of the world die off or kill each other for the left over scraps. Probably 10 countries would survive the 10 years without US aid. Exports or Importing goods to the US. Is your country one of them?

Answer 4

The US will never stop interfering in world affairs as long as the corporate/political sectors see it as a lucrative opportunity ,,,, The true leaders of this country are the corporate/political sector ,,,,, The politicians are bought and owned by the corporate sector and they will not make a decision until they have studied how lucrative it's going to be for themselves first,,,, The corporate/political sector is using the American people as a resource to draw from for bodies to go fight the wars they are raking billions in from ,,,,If you look into it you'll learn that they don't send their own children to war ,,,, Bush himself is a good example of that ,,,, in fact his whole military career is shady ,,, He was too much of a coward to go to Viet Nam when it was his turn to serve but he's very willing to send other peoples children now that he has the authority to do so ,,,, It's always easy to be brave when you command from the rear where they keep the gear ,,,,Wars and bodies are the true reason behind the Republicans being against abortion ,,,, They could care less about the humanitarian issues connected with it ,,,,, To have wars you need to have people ,,,, To have people you have to have babies ,,,,to have babies you have to be against abortion ,,,,, The corporate/political sector is always going to want a crop of young people to draw from to fight some future lucrative war some where ,,,,, abortion is counter productive to their agenda ,,,, They've been doing this since Korea up to and including today and will continue to do so in the future unless the American people wake up and put a stop to it ,,,,

Answer 5

OK - so let's start by not sending any more aid, food or money to your country.
I am sure we can use all those millions of dollars for our own people instead.

In answer to the second part of your question why should we give anything at all to other countries, especially those who then criticize us and our policies? If I ask my people to shell out millions in their hard-earned tax dollars to help another country, only to be called arrogant and interfering, I would stop aiding that ungrateful, back-stabbing country immediately!
And what is with the one word sentence: "Unilateral?" If you are referring to yourself or the subject I would have to concur.

Answer 6

Can you imagine? Look to history. The last time that was done in the 1920's, the result was the Great Depression.

If you are comfortable with the world's economies tanking, great. I'm not.

Answer 7

The reality is that the US is merely doing what other nations would love to do, but can't as they don't have either the finances or the military strength.

At the height of its power, Britain controlled 1/4 of the World, including America. It stole, it impossed its will, it invaded.

The Soviet Union did likewise in order to maintain its power-base.

If the USA wants to stay "top" then it needs to undermine those countries challenging it, whilst strengthening those it feels will be of benefit to it.

Sometimes it gets it right, other times completely wrong.

Answer 8

Usually we are asked. Do you really think the Saudi Government is not funding the US role in the middle east? They pay us to be there, why do you think US taxes have not been raised to fund the war? A lot of the EU nations asked us to be there as well as Public support would get some of them into trouble.

Answer 9

There have been 2 occasions we became isolated and in both occasions 2 world wars broke out. We should do it one more time, the world that complains about us could use another world war and this time they would be on their own. As someone already said, be careful of what you wish for.

Answer 10

All the survivalists... Jeez. You people are always going on about the end of the friggin world...

Besides, if we ever stopped interfering, we would be criticized for pulling out. Oh the irony.