2006-11-24 18:41:09 · 8 answers · asked by larryjr3333 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The war wasn't a mistake. Saddam was sentenced to hang by his country.
Bush is a good president. He's the only one that followed thru with the inspections and he tried to get them to cooperate.
2006-11-24 18:46:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Iraq war in my view seems to be a mistake in the reason why we went..
I personally am all for taking out Saddam and "trying" to give Iraqis freedom, but what about other countries such as Somalia? Why Iraq? This whole world police isnt very good either, we should improve our own countries before we go into others and mess it up.. Iraq could have been done WAY better.
I'm pretty sure it was for the oil deal, and I don't agree with that..
Bush also needs to get out, not just because of Iraqi, because he lies, breaks laws and the constitution and it's just so damn hard to trust him with such power.. It could be worse, but I don't like how things are now..
2006-11-25 02:51:05 · answer #2 · answered by Shadowfox 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The war was defiantly a mistake and I think George Bush Jr will go down in history as the worst American president ever.
2006-11-25 04:45:49 · answer #3 · answered by molly 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush is not a good president , he is owned by Israel and oil men and he dosent' have enough sense to hire good intelligent advisers and listen to them, Ronald Reagan said he was not Einstein , but, he had enough sense to get good info from his men,
and it was a mistake to go into Iraq , but now that we are there we can't afford to leave with out winning , if we leave before we break the Taliban they will be here shortly and that is a promise,
2006-11-25 02:52:00 · answer #4 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If you posed the question like the professor asked at least the Dems would be all about it then because of all the people that Suddam was killing they would have more compassion wanting to save them
2006-11-25 03:38:08 · answer #5 · answered by josh m 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would pose the question this way. Knowing what we now know, if we could go back to 2003, would we go ahead with the invasion anyway?
2006-11-25 02:44:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's a "present" we shouldn't have unwrapped!
2006-11-25 07:39:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No! YES!!!
2006-11-25 02:43:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋