2006-11-24 17:00:57 · 11 answers · asked by Melinda B 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
The premise is false.
The Englishman would get an American to fight for him, and the Frenhman wouldn't stick around to see who showed up.
2006-11-24 19:27:55 · answer #1 · answered by ZenPenguin 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The USA will intervene militarily against the French man to rescue the English man but USA is going to put a mess all over the place ... they are going to kill all the people around. The USA will try, once again, to cover up their mistake by developping new strategies that lead people to focus on something else and forget about the mess. Until now, the two men are still fighting.
2006-11-24 19:02:34 · answer #2 · answered by Beauty_Queen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historically the British tend to beat the living daylights out of the French in armed conflicts, but they were the last country to invade us in 1066...
2006-11-24 17:11:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the United States would butt in and they would both win!
just kidding...I don't know, the French don't have the best track record, so I'd have to say the English.
2006-11-24 17:10:51 · answer #4 · answered by PANDABEAR 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The French guy cause Frenchies are hardcore.
2006-11-24 17:03:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only winners will be the people watching such a humorous girlie fight.
2006-11-24 17:03:11 · answer #6 · answered by Roovs 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Need more info. But since they are both on the side of USA then it would be negotiated into peace.
2006-11-24 17:04:00 · answer #7 · answered by rahlyd swamp muffin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on where the fight would take place.
However I feel it's a dumb question and it deserves a dumb answer.
2006-11-24 17:09:13 · answer #8 · answered by martox45 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They will get together and kick your fight-starter a**
2006-11-24 17:10:27 · answer #9 · answered by OC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the frenchman
2006-11-24 18:38:59 · answer #10 · answered by HADEEL MAZIN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋