English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

oh yeh and if you say america will get what they deserve then go move to china of something

2006-11-24 16:03:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

17 answers

no one wins that one - we end up with a smoking blackened globe wobbling off axis thru the galaxy. Global thermonuclear war - the only way to win is not to play.

2006-11-24 16:08:00 · answer #1 · answered by Norman 7 · 4 0

Well the US and Britain have beat Russia before but China have the manpower but I'm sure Britain and the US would prevail in the end because we have never lost a war together and why should be start now.Russia wouldn't like to fight the Brit's again because in the cold war Russia was going to nuke British troops because they didn't want to fight the Brit's

2006-11-25 03:30:46 · answer #2 · answered by HHH 6 · 0 1

That is an interesting question and I hope it doesnt' happen. No one has successfully invaded russia because of its size and weather. China has so many people that it would be tough to match them based on shear numbers. I would hope that the US and Britain would win, but that would be a tough one. I will put a paycheck on the US and Britain, just because I don't want our next leader to be Cho Ching Fat. If that happens I will defect to Canada.

2006-11-24 16:10:19 · answer #3 · answered by NightTrainWooWoo 4 · 0 1

Russia and China has to get previous the final military on earth: the U. S. military that's greater useful. the U. S. military could sink Russian ships and chinese language ships. And it may turn nuclear because of the fact China and Russia could not propel assaults against mainland us of a of america with out fleets of warships. ICBMs and SLBMs could be their very own saving grace. recreation over because of the fact the u . s . a . has nukes besides.

2016-10-13 01:43:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

China has a huge numbers advantage. However we have the better technology,and Russia,and China would both starve to death without the U.S. giving them food they way we have over the past 30 years, but the real answer would be in this day,and age we would all lose because whoever was on the verge of defeat would push the Nuke button,and that would end it all for the entire planet

2006-11-24 16:08:29 · answer #5 · answered by Carl The Green's Keeper 2 · 0 4

In the war you suggest, China and Russia would win. Their troops are rested; their equipment isn't beat to crap, and their military is waaaay larger. Any more questions?

2006-11-24 16:40:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If China/Russia were truly allied, then I think they'd have the advantage, but really, they don't like each other. If it came down to it, they'd probably fight themselves and knock each other out before we'd even get involved!

2006-11-24 16:24:48 · answer #7 · answered by joannaserah 6 · 0 1

it would be a tough battle seriously. russia and china have nuclear arms. china has tons of ground troops. and china has tons of money to invest in war material.. thanks to our purhasing of their goods and our stupid trade laws.. their air fores are not as advanced or their navy but they are working on an elite army that does have advanced weaponry. i dont want to see this war happen... my heart is with the US no doubt but that is a war we dont want to try right now.

2006-11-24 16:12:56 · answer #8 · answered by answers999 6 · 0 1

Well I would say USA would blow the crap out of the other 2 itself but Man never underestimate Britain. Those Brits are on our side am I am glad.

I would say USA+UK would win....would be very costly though

2006-11-24 23:27:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think to just put it out there as "a war between country X & country Y" doesn't give enough information. for example: who would win in a war between the U.S. and Vietnam. well, what are the conditions? If vietnam is trying to invade us, they are stupid. vice versa if we are trying to invade them.

Oh and theres also the wuold issue of Mutually Assured Destruction.

But, because I'm bored, lets set up a scenario:

Causus Belli: Now I can't see any of us directly declaring war on each other for any reason. so this would have to start out as a proxy war. so, lets take the current issues Isue with North Korea as our starting point.

Assuming that explosion in N. Korea was nuclear and not just a bunch of TNT or whatever, lets say they escalate their program to the point where China is prompted to Invade.

(It would not be either the US or UK, that starts this. I don't care if you are a lib or neocon, Just visualise the skepticism if Bush said that we here going to invade another country to get rid of WMDs.)

Anyway, this is seen by South Koreans, Japanese, and Taiwanese as a potential threat to their sovereignty. they start building up militaries (do you really think a Yankee-written constitution is gonna hold back Japan?).

as a result of Indoctination, Poverty, being kept south of the border, possibly racism accompanied by atrocities, and good ol' nationalism the North Koreans begin an insurgency vs the Chinese. the south Koreans, and possibly the Japanese & Taiwanese begin supporting this secretly. Also, some nationalistic South Koreans travel North and start going all Robert Jordan on the Chinese. Both of these become known to the chinese, who begin landing special ops teams on S. Korean beaches. the south korean governemtn decides, needing to split the attention of the north korean government, so send psy-ops and spectial ops teams into Tibet to begin fomenting a rebellion.

all this while Iran has been working on nuclear wheapons technology, relying on the Korean Diversion. The Anglophones havce scant special ops teams into Iran to attempt to investigate or sabotage these. They discover Russian and Chinese advisors. this doesn't lead directly to war, it just increases tensions.

so when does war get declared? well, at this point any number of things could happen, but lets just pick one: an overenthusiastic taiwanese guerilla shoots a chinese dignitary in Fuxian province. He becomes Archduke Franz Ferdinan.

note: when I give the name of an existing country, I am indicating the support of that country's government. If I give the name of a region that is part of another country, that region has rebelled or is acting independently. Popular support for a nation's stance in the war would vary from nation to nation.

China declares war on Korea and Japan and declares that it is asserting it's control over its posesions on the island of Taiwan.

the agressive nature of China's actions also prompts the UK, America, Australia, Tazmania, New Zealand, singapore and malasia to become declare war on China. the enterance of these nations is due in part to obligations under the Five Power Defence Arrangementsn and ANZUS Treaty.

Russia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan join with China as part of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Joining these nations are Belarus, Armenia of the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

with the involvement of Russia and Belarus, Nato is forced to declare war on the Eurasian Powers, bringing in the following nations : Belgium, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Greece, Turkey, Germany, & Spain.

this also brings to the surface many rivalries that havent yet Eurupted

Iran, now officially at war with the US declares war on the "Zionist encroachments" and the viceroys of Mesopotamia and Bactria.

Pakistan declares war on India, Maoist rebels in Hepal rise up in favor of china. Tibetian rebels against it. this creates chaos in the Hymalayas.

Syria & Somalia join Iran, and stir up islamist uprisings in Saudia Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon (ok, the iranians don't have to do much stirring for hezbollah) and other muslum nations, though these are opposed by the government.

Sudan uses this as a cover for it's Genocidal campaingns and an invastion of Chad.

this would probably send many nations of the EU in to assist, especialy Anglophone countries such as Kenya, Nigeria and S, Africa.

latin america would probably not get directly involved, though the US might invade Cuba. Venesuela would be a pro eurasian free port. Military dictatorship would rise.

I was supposed to answer who would win wasn't I. well, I'm going with the anglophone countties b/c I'm betting on them being able to establish naval and air.

this is assuming nobody used nuclear weapons.

2006-11-25 14:18:34 · answer #10 · answered by armorsmith42 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers