Only if we can kill or sacrifice you.
Ha. But seriously, yes, we probably should kill them, since they provide one of our most important food sources.
Historically, humans (especially nomads) probably would have died without hunting. And today we'd just hit all the deer with cars if we disallowed it.
2006-11-24 16:13:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we should kill animals. I'm not the sacrificing type.
1 Food animals need to be killed so we can eat them. At least that'd would be the nicer way to eat them.
2. Animals that are suffering should be killed. Death is a mercy to something that's dying in a painful way.
3. Are we going to start policing animals from killing other animals? What will we feed the lions, tigers, and bears of the world?
2006-11-24 23:32:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by manywarhoops 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Having sympathy for animals is very nice indeed, but people should worry ,focus and direct thier attention towards, scores of humans killed by poverty, starvation, natural disasters & voilence. why dont these so called " animal activists " people volunteer, to save humans, educate the poor , and make this world a better place to live. Do they not see so many people dying each day.Are they just inhuman towards, thier own race, but rather worry about saving a dog , or protecting a cow.
what a pity.
2006-11-25 06:01:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by guy with intel inside 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Humans are Smart Enough to Know whats Right and Whats Wrong
Unless it Was So Imp We Wouldnt Kill or Scrifice Animals
2006-11-24 23:30:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by HARSHIL S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why you dint ask this question regard to plant. Even plant is a living thing. As also mosquito or insects or fish. Killing may be bad.
We should use word like brought to use for larger bigger, prosporus living think. Here We Human being called ourselves Properous living creature. So any think beneficial to Human being is good and allowed.
Sacrifce also is part of above. We who called our selves as Scientific resoning belivers not know many thinks regarding benefits of scrifice.
2006-11-24 23:48:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
do exactly what you think is right & whatever your conscience permits, a lot of animals & poultry are bred & grown totally for table purpose only,this is very different proposition to hunting & killing endangered species.even when religion permits sacrifice,i dont think compulsion comes into the picture.
2006-11-25 00:35:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by dee k 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you have heard of food chain. In this world everyone survives by killing the weaker One. Lion won't stop to philosophize if he was hungry and saw us as the easy prey. But then, lion won't offer us as a sacrifice to his God, if his stomach was full. I am in for killing animals if it was absolutely necessary such as for food or we were in danger of being killed ourselves but not killing or sacrificing animals unnecessarily and being kind to them otherwise.
2006-11-25 00:01:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Smriti 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no we shoouldn't kill/sacrifice animals (btw sacrificing IS killing).
generally yes, all things should. there are of course exceptions.
i'm fine with other animals killing what they need for subsistence, but the way humans go about it is terrible and unnecessary
2006-11-25 06:33:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by persephonecall 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I M DEFINATELY AGAINST KILLING ANIMALS.
WHY SHOULD WE?
JUST BECAUSE THAY TASTE GOOD?
WELL, THEN I M A SAVAGE AND I THINK U TASTE GOOD TOO. SHOULD I KILL AND EAT U?
BEING MORE INTELLIGENT AND POWERFUL THAN ANY OTHER SPECIES DOES NOT GIVE U RIGHT TO KILL NE ONE AND EVERY ONE.
COME ON, EVEN IF WE DONT EAT ANIMALS THE FOOD CYCLE IS GOING TO REMAIN UNDIASTURBED. _______THIS IS A FACT________
AND SACRIFICING A ANIMAL?
THATS SUPERFICIAL AND STUPID!
2006-11-25 09:57:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by jello 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
God gives up permission in the Bible to kill animals after the flood.
2006-11-24 23:30:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋