English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A few hours ago I put up a Q if any highly sexed girls out here were, like me, happily polyamourous as a way to have what we need that avoids a singular emotional entanglement that would interfere with academic studies. (It also avoids the shallowness of just hooking up but I did not mention that). Given the Qs and As I had read in this category I frankly did not expect many As from fellow polyamourists, so I was really, really surprised that I did, almost all being positive and one even saying how, like me, she had followed her mother's advice. But two As said they had changed from being poly to selecting only one guy, but in a lover arrangement agreement (which I suppose means sharing more than just being f**k friends though I am not sure). If you are a F that is or has been involved in a monogamous lover agreement arrangement how do you/did you avoid getting too dependent or either of you getting greater emotional feelings of the sort that are avoided by polyamourous caring?

2006-11-24 09:26:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

4 answers

well, one can enjoy the same independance, and satisfy your drive utilizing a monogamous arrangement, providing both partners are "on board" where sex is concerned. Ask for a service call and know its a mutual need. Key detail is never exp-lain yourself; a friend doesn't need it, and a foe won't believe it. I find just the right life balance by adhereing to this credo: First, do no harm, then, do as thy will.

2006-11-24 09:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would think polyamory would be a greater risk...amory meaning love...just being promiscuous would better sate the sex drive, while avoiding the risk of emotional ties...

I've had a single "friend with benefits" in the past and it worked fine...for me, it simply has to be someone for whom I have no romantic feelings toward or no "spark" but like well enough to share intimacy with...if there's emotional attraction, then that will lead to issues (of course) especially if the other party doesn't reciprocate those feelings...conversely (for me) if there are no emotional feelings toward the other person at all, I become disinterested in the situation fairly quickly...sex with no emotion, is just dry and not a whole lot more entertaining than masturbation...

...every now and then it's more fun and passionate to play with someone I don't know well, rather than get involved sexually with someone that I do know (and continue it)...

2006-11-24 17:34:39 · answer #2 · answered by . 7 · 0 0

We both have been married before and just screwed around before, which is a good way to catch something. We met and stayed ,mostly independent even though we live together and act like we are married, we do not need the paper, which seems to put control over a person, at least in their mind. It has been more than 3 years and it is like we just 1st met. We can leave whenever we want but we both think that we will last forever!And we always have the choice if we want someone else to join us.

2006-11-24 17:54:16 · answer #3 · answered by rhonda_seiler 6 · 0 0

there is a name in the Bible for women that are sexually active with more than one man, Harlot. sounds like the name fits you perfect. i bet you don't like that name. i even bet you are trying to think up hateful names to call me because i told you who you are. don't worry you will forget that when you live up to your name tonight. good women stick to one man and usually are married to them. it would be a hard trick for a harlot but you should try it some time.

2006-11-25 16:53:55 · answer #4 · answered by Thumbs down me now 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers