There isn't.
That was disproven long ago.
Here's the link to Wikipedia that discusses this more in length.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Supper_by_Da_Vinci
2006-11-24 08:42:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by sworddove 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
lol !!!
omg!
WHAT? DO YOU THINK LEONARDO DA VINCI'S PAINTING IS LIKE A PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD OF THE EVENT?
The painting is so inaccurate even as to the social customs for table design and seating arrangement. Many experts even believe that Leonardo painted himself into the picture...TWICE! (Once when he was young, and again when he was older.)
The painting comes from the imagination of the artist; similarly, the book DaVinci Code was from the imagination of the author.
Please do some (any) research before asking such a question.
2006-11-24 08:52:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bobby Jim 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Disproven? when where?
At the very least it’s only a DaVinci point of view of the last super nothing more. But it is possible he knew more then we did being closer to the time. Things that are hidden now.
2006-11-24 08:43:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Coool 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because Divinchi put her there. Actually I think that was supposed to be an apostle. As you know, he wasn't very factual with the bible. The bible says it was just Jesus and the 12 disciples with Him at the last supper.
2006-11-24 08:48:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Thats John the beloved disciple.
2006-11-24 08:53:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It was John, the beloved. In Davinci's day, it was common to paint men somewhat effeminate.
2006-11-24 08:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by gachickinaz 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, as the story goes, there was this nice lady that stopped by. And out of gratitude for Jesus's teachings and intervention, she coated him with a very expensive scented oil. ( I supposed that modern equivalent would be if some one handed you a $2,000 tux as a gift of thanks ). It's actually quite an interesting story about judgment and intent.
2006-11-24 08:45:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Odindmar 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Read the DaVinci code
2006-11-24 08:43:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by autumn 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
There are plenty of art historians that will tell you that teenage men were portrayed in what we would consider a feminine look to indicate their age and innocence in the Renaissance.
2006-11-24 08:48:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Makemeaspark 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
The person is not a woman. The person is John, the Apostle.
2006-11-24 08:46:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Robert M 1
·
1⤊
1⤋