That's not counting Iraqi lives, Afgani lives, allied soldiers lives and aliied support crew lives. Shouldn't we just get the hell out?
2006-11-23 20:25:16 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Well... you have to remember....
our soldiers that are over there....knew why they
signed up. They knew where they were going.
They weren't drafted.
And since our soldiers have been over there...
there have been no more 'civiian' deaths over here.
It's a hard call...
God....I hate war!!
I've always said....if two countries can't get along...
put the two leaders in a ring to duke it out.
Save the little guy's lives.
*******************
2006-11-23 20:33:57 · answer #1 · answered by COOKIE 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the cost of revenge is continually too severe. yet what you should comprehend is this conflict isn't about revenge, nor has it ever been. This conflict replaced into and is about monetary benefit for the agencies that run u . s . a . of america. that's not twist of destiny that Afghanistan has the biggest remaining oil reserve interior the international. (that's why the U.S. replaced into attempting to attain administration for diverse years). Our united states needed this conflict to proceed in that's position because the whole asskicker on the the planet. The oil, the heroin, and the gold received through this conflict will ascertain that the U. S. stay a important potential in this international. The revenge element replaced into only a fashion to get us riled up and puzzled so as that our authorities ought to do such issues as invade Iraq while not having to face important disapproval. undergo in concepts, after 9/11, we were so mad that we did not ask questions at the same time as Bush suggested enable's flow to conflict by assessment guy maximum of you under no circumstances heard of. there is so a lot extra occurring than meets the interest. This conflict will proceed, and many extra will die in the previous that's over. And if Bush and Cheney have their way, it may under no circumstances be over. the money to be received is basically too tremendous.
2016-10-16 10:17:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks like the government doesn't know the history of the middle east. If they did, they would know...there is NO winning a war over there. Oh, it could be won...but I promise...those people will go back to living the way they have for thousands of years.
Outside terrorists were not responsible for 9-11. The war over there is illgeal in the first place.
2006-11-24 03:24:24 · answer #3 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should leave when the job is done. Are you saying that if we knew before going to war that this many people would die, that you think we should never have gone to war in the first place? We should let terrorists kill 2819 of our citizens and do nothing in retaliation? Or let Saddam run free? As I recall, he was recently sentenced to death, which is a victory for our campaign. And his death may result in thousands of others living...
And why does everyone calculate war as only being worth it as long as our death toll is low? I wish that no american soldier ever had to die, but if they do die, I would hope we accomplish something. Do you HONESTLY think that the 2871 soldiers that have died thus far would want the US to quit and run and make their deaths meaningless?
2006-11-23 20:38:02 · answer #4 · answered by Tyler 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Allies now own the Middle East. That's not defeat that's a win.
I Cr 13;8a
11-24-6
2006-11-23 21:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, time to admit defeat. And from the moral point of view, the US should get out of Iraq.
2006-11-23 22:04:15 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is very bad what we done there. Like Vietnam we lose more and more good people for nothing. 9/11 was bad but this is worse. Now civil war in Iraq and we no control it. Time to get the hell out - yes. And get Bush the hell out too.
2006-11-23 20:31:48 · answer #7 · answered by hoho 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We didn't lose all that many at Pearl Harbor.
Should we have quit WWII as soon as the totals got to be close to the same.
Your thinking is out of whack.
The Islamic Extremists have said all non Muslims must convert or die.
Fight them there, or fight them here.
Would you rather it have been 2871 more civillians?
Maybe your friends, neighbors, children...
http://usawakeup.org
2006-11-23 20:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES ESPECIALLY SINCE IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11!
THE ONLY THING IRAQ HAD TO DO WITH WAS OFFENDING THE BUSHES ...................THIS IS THE BUSH VENDETTA!
WHEN ARE PEOPLE GOING TO GET FED UP AND OUT IN THE STREETS AND PUT A STOP TO ALL OF THIS BUREAUCRATIC HATE AND MURDER!
2006-11-24 05:42:57 · answer #9 · answered by Crampy Grampy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time for the USA Government to go to the International Tribunal and answer for crimes against Humanity.
If Saddam is getting capital punishment, why isn't Bush and his
advisers getting the same treatment? It's only justice.
2006-11-23 20:41:24 · answer #10 · answered by RainbowGirl 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋