English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-23 18:53:15 · 19 answers · asked by khochchor 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Actually I want to know that if they landed really then why this project is abandoned today? NASA has expensed billion billon doller behind space project. This is how much cost? They proove it in present info age that men really landed on moon. What is the fear? Will real truth be leaked?

2006-11-23 19:49:43 · update #1

LASTLY I AM NOT AMERICAN.

2006-11-24 04:15:16 · update #2

19 answers

YOU ARE RIGHT.
America is making fool, they never landed on moon, it is all fake story.

2006-11-24 16:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by vinisha v 2 · 0 0

you have been gazing the incorrect video clips then. that's a hundred% particular the six Apollo landings between 1969 and 1972 have been actual. human beings make the errors of comparing a $a million,000 notebook immediately to a million greenback mainframe that filled a room in 1969 and had far much less computing skill and say that proves technologies has stepped forward adequate to assist you to circulate to the Moon immediately. From this they leap to the tip that if it nonetheless too costly and puzzling immediately it would have been impossible then. What they could do is evaluate a $20,000 vehicle immediately that gets the comparable MPG and has the comparable suitable velocity as a vehicle costing $3,000 in 1969 and then understand that basically computers (and all electronics technologies) has enjoyed remarkable advances at the same time as automobiles (and all transportation technologies alongside with rockets) have not. So that's barely as costly and puzzling immediately because it became into in 1969 and nonetheless no longer worth to fee to maintain doing it. that's additionally why incredibly some large robotic missions to planets have flown on account that then. because of the fact the small, mild weight, and noticeably in a position robotic area craft we can build with stepped forward electronics technologies may be fairly sent lots farther away than the Moon with the comparable previous inefficient and costly rockets we are nonetheless utilising.

2016-12-10 14:49:16 · answer #2 · answered by barsky 4 · 0 0

Going to the moon is expensive. And nobody really thought about making a daily passengery between earth and the moon. But, wait; there is nothing on the moon. If there are no resources, no atmosphere, no food, no air, then what's the point of investing so much!

Mars would be a better place which can be colonized by humans. Only the future would tell.

2006-11-23 18:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1 0

What sort of ignorant you are I do not know. Whom do You think NASA is. They are not your Dad & Mom. What do yu think of strating a service between Moon & Earth. You thought it is between Newyork to Newjersy or Newyork to New Delhi.

It is Pure Science. You have get out of this planet and still live and come alive. You need support systems and you cannot catch some train or bus to land there. You need to be lifted in Rocket. You thought all this costs nothing. After spending all the money is it worth landing again and again in Moon. No A BIg No.

That is called Viablity. When you spend billions and billion of dollors in science is not for telling lies.

Why do you want go up to moon. You Americans cannot even fly in your own F-16's. To enjoy the experience you guys are travelling to starcity Moscow to fly MIGs.

As common citizens, In USA you are not even graduated to fly ur fighter planes then think of Moon. Ridiculous. Not only USA all other countries common public has a limit to Aeronautics. Only Russia has allowed to experience mach-2 or 3.

So in science u can only learn to experience everything it is Risky particularly Aer-space. Okay ignorant?

2006-11-23 21:27:04 · answer #4 · answered by Loganathan Raja Rajun R 3 · 0 0

People who don't believe we landed on the moon are in the same conspiracy theory camp as those who think the American government engineered 9/11. It's called "Not a Shred of Proof Camp." What would be the point in a daily shuttle to the moon? Has Wal-Mart finally run out of small towns to throttle and set up shop on the moon? Aside from the enormous expense this would involve, is real estate on the rise there or something? Ack, this is too silly.

2006-11-23 19:12:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is apparent that you have absolutely no idea of how much it costs to launch a rocket to the moon as well as the risk involved in such a space adventure. Who wants to go to the moon anyway? There is nothing up there except arrid land and rocks.

2006-11-23 19:54:31 · answer #6 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0 0

Did you ever hear of Apollo 13 where the 3 astronauts nearly died? The price of going to the moon is TOO MUCH MONEY. Today with terrorism problems the money is better spent on securitty for people and medicinal cures for Cancer, Aides and Heart problems. You clean up your back yard before cleaning up your neighbors. Get it?

2006-11-23 20:32:24 · answer #7 · answered by devora k 7 · 0 0

What makes you think one would naturally lead to the other? There is not one speck of hard evidence that the moon landings were faked, but the expectation that we should now start shuttling people to the moon is too ridiculous to even warrant serious responses.

2006-11-23 18:56:03 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Curious 6 · 4 0

why would u want to go the moon? its just a big rock. nasa is spending their money trying to go to much cooler, farther away places. plus there's the space station, and people are living there all the year long now.

2006-11-23 18:58:03 · answer #9 · answered by jezabella 3 · 1 0

For what purpose?? Just because you want it proven to you personally that it can/was done? Because it isn't necessary or productive nor will it serve any useful purpose at this time.


I'm with Farzand. We should have been making preparations to terraform Mars 10 years ago.

2006-11-23 18:59:14 · answer #10 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers