1. Whatever to be represented must be an origin.
2. Whatever is to be represented must be an origin.
What is the difference in the meaning of these two statements?
2006-11-23 18:32:30 · 8 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Is - just a small difference!!
2006-11-23 20:59:19 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Not grammatical
2. Grammatical
2006-11-24 13:34:21 · answer #2 · answered by hq3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply yu must accept we originated from ape egg came with chicken. So that explains what came first. I came from egg. Accept it yu fool.wake up yu idiot.An EGG made me.
2006-11-24 02:46:14 · answer #3 · answered by zyp_john 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh give me a break. you don't make any sense. Learn english before you ask questions here. you are talking jibberish
NONE Of these words are used as woulld be used by english speaking persons.
ARE you so dumb that you keep asking over and over again. GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
2006-11-25 07:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by sugarsweetsweetiepie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first sentence is not propper english.
2006-11-24 02:35:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would appear that one is present while the other is future tense.
2006-11-24 12:30:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU DON"T MAKE ANY SENSE
WHY KEEP ASKING questions over and over again.
I am finding myself very frustrated with your constant questions that don't make any sense.
PLEASE STOP I am sick and tired of you.
2006-11-25 07:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by cuttiestrawberypie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first sentence is wrong
2006-11-24 02:33:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋