English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-23 17:54:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I was speaking of aid to the Iraqi government, not the insurgents.

2006-11-23 17:59:14 · update #1

6 answers

If they want to spend money let them. that's less we have to but they get no say on what goes on there.

2006-12-01 00:47:50 · answer #1 · answered by r.alanbrown1969 2 · 0 0

Iranian and Syria are already aideing many insurget groups in Iraq I do not think it is in our best intrest to "encourage" them to aide these terrorist groups any further than they already currently are.

2006-11-24 01:57:22 · answer #2 · answered by Joshua V 2 · 1 0

And let the Iranian President get closer to Israel so he can complete his goal of destroying Israel? It's one of the most ludicrous ideas that are being espoused.

2006-11-24 05:16:50 · answer #3 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0 0

F*CK NO! Iran are the sob's that should be getting their @ss kicked for supplying the Shiites with arms, causing the civil upheaval.

2006-11-24 01:59:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Both Iran and Syria are Muslim states and are sworn to destroy us. Do you want to sit down and negotiate with these bastards?
Suicide is quicker.

2006-11-24 04:06:43 · answer #5 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 1 0

lol i think we should just level the whole problem over there. i mean we built the A bomb for a reason right? use the thing then we won't need any help over there

2006-11-24 02:09:20 · answer #6 · answered by us_pilot 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers