Team management has a very big role to play. As you see during Dalmiya and Ganguly period the team was playing as a team to win. but when Pawar and Greg has come i have seen a severe down fall in the teams performance. But commercially we are doing good but were is the performance. Chappel has scattered the team. Our bowlers like Phatan have to do batting. Shewag is totally out of colour. We don't even have a back up for any thing, Were is the team management. I think it all goes like "Andho ke Raj mai Kana Raja"
Also it looks so sad the in the champions trophy Pawar also wanted lime light. and then Aussies had to ask for apology It was their day. I feel so bad about the situation of our team.
Hope we Indian's will re group and be a strong team like the Aussies can you believe they are maintaining two teams one for test and one for One dayers. They have their back up plans totally intact.. But cant say the same about the Indian Team what if Sachin retires. I think Mike Hussy can take over as from Ricky... SO team management plays a vital role...
2006-11-23 17:27:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
EGO, TOO MUCH PRIDE
One stage scoreboard was 70 something for 6 wickets!
Role of the team management? Players should try to think and act like the world champs Australians, game is not finished unless one of the sides wins.
It is not somebody else fault, it’s completely players fault.
All 11 players in the field should to act more wisely. In terms of team management, captain is utterly useless; he could not coordinate and lead the team.
Whether it is cricket team or a group of business consultants in real world, any team would require a leader and a follower, its leader responsibility to know the where the team is heading and how the team would achieve its vision and goals. While its follower responsibility to listen and follow the leader. There is no one specific role as a leader or a follower.
Here is something interesting that might you understand better!
“The truth is, however, that in the modern model of leadership, followers don’t necessarily follow and ….. At different times and in different situations, their roles are interchangeable” (The Call for Leadership by Lester Levy).
Indian team would face more humiliating defeats 'Unless individuals take responsibility and be proactive'.
2006-11-27 13:57:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The team management should be answerable for the team's failure. If the management can claim accolades when the team performs well, they should also be prepared to accept the brickbats when the team is down in the dumps. A captains responsibility is not limited to just playing well & scoring runs. If that was the case then he is as good as the remaining 10 players...they are also expected to score runs & take wickets. The captain has additional responsibilty to ensure that all the players perform at their optimum level. If that does not happen, the captain must take the responsibility & not just wash his hands off saying the players are not doing well.
2006-11-27 11:24:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Subhanjan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes! and only Yes should be the answer for the follllowing reason.
1. Selection is done as per the selector influence not on merits.
2. Selectors are reluctant to drop senior players from the playing eleven ,though they are out of form. this is shown by the manner in which Shevag is still in the playing 11
3.I m not a supporter of Ganguly but he is 100% better captain than any other, in regards to is form , he is at the same level as Dravid.
4. BCCI has enough of money , now they must spent not on the players but on th einfrastructure and making bouncy pitches. They should also spent in search of new talent both from city and rural.
hence they are only and only responsible. The other boards are not the same
2006-11-27 14:35:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Raymond R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well,I think that there is not too much interference of team management in the defeat because the players are playing in the ground not the team management so it's all depends upon the players not on the Chapell or any other so in my opinion we have to stop blaming the coach and the players so that they could do their works properly.
2006-11-27 05:26:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Team Management must be stern .They can start with dropping Tendulkar for one match because he dropped a vital catch. That can send the message. Youngsters must be given a fair chance but must be told the upper limit. Then BCCI should prepare bouncy pitches in domestic cricket at least in some place so that everybody gets a chance to acclimatize. The fans can make the cricketers see sense by not seeing the matches. Once the viewing goes down, sponsers would go away and cricketers would see sense.
2006-11-27 03:55:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by litali k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only blame I can think of for the team management is the batting order, as I strongly feel that Rahul Dravid should have
come at No. 3 insted of sending Mohd. Kaif. Further Dinesh Mongia should have been sent to bat ahed of Dhoni.
Otherwise the entire blame for the pathetic performance should go to the Indian Players. If players of the calibre and experience of Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid cannot stay at the wicket and consolidate the innings, it is entirely shame not only to their reputation in the world cricket, but also to India.
2006-11-23 20:44:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
management has very important role to play. u cannot totally blame the coach , his job is to plan the strategy ,it is up to the players to execute it may be it is bowling or batting.
coming to management point , indian board is the richest cricket board in the world , still we do not have world class stadium in india like aussies ,england have , they earn the money but not spend properly?
player also should respect the feeling of the fans .
lack of good fundamental structure in indian cricket is the main reason for the downfall.
at present cricket board is acting as a bussiness man, not for the well being of the game.
2006-11-25 19:39:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bala 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
TEAM management is,
Define performace on batting and balling, like Shri DRAVID / RAVI Shastri will play 100 balls to make 10 runs. It is (negative) -100 out of 100 marks. And then
(A)
FOR PLAYERS:
1)
[Pay - kick back ] be proportional.
( if negative take money back from the player)
and
2)
the best performer of the match will be the captain in the next match ie rolling captain.
if the team is defeated
2 worst performer from batting
2 worst performer from bowling
1 all rounder ( if not performed well)
1 wicket keeper ( if not performed well)
shall be changed without any argument by any political parties.
(B)
FOR
COACH,
SELECTOR,
BCCI,
1)
if the team win the test/ ODI series it will continue
2)
if the team loose the test/ ODI series new CAPABLE will step in and all in the capacity of
COACH,
SELECTOR,
BCCI
shall be changed without any argument by any political parties.
2006-11-24 18:00:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by narayan 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is a constant series of experiments , that never seems to cease - is it not time that the coach and captain learnt about all available options, and have got on to a steady team ?
And players dont deserve the demi-god status that we seem to bestow upon them, instantly, for just one freak performance - take the example of Dhoni - he is woefully inadequate , both as a keeper as well as a batsman - too much of money, has reduced him to counting endorsements, and not performances - and we continue to dwell upon the one big innings, and discount all successive failures.
Munaf already has developed a problem with his throwing arm, Agarkar also performs in fits and starts, Zaheer and Pathan are no different - Indian Bowling, Batting and fielding are all suspect. Maybe, we should get ourselves relegated to the second rung of cricket playing countries, and build all over again ?
And definitely, we CAN DO WITHOUT Greg Chappel - he is Australia's secret weapon.
2006-11-25 00:26:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by vijayan_arunachalam 1
·
2⤊
0⤋